How so, codes?

actually, depends. IT was really hitler that cared about race

There were also racial/ethnic elements in socialist States though

Italian fascism was not about race as much

then why does the current wave of socialists care so much about segregation?

Where fascism and communism match is that the individual is irrelevant. the needs of the many outweigh the needs of the one.

I was unaware of an intrinsic class divide in fascist theory.

there isn't

Becuase the current wave are fascists not soclialists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKoalZCSMPE

True fascism is just having an "over-state" that can swoop in during times of crisis, and override any and all authority

Classical liberalism, of which I am a proponent, believes that only by freeing the individual will society prosper

i agree

They also match in terms of a focus on economic control, and are ultimately necessarily imperialist as a result

Because a command economy in isolation is going to get fucked

Both fascism and communism subsume the individual

Both also performed mass murder on the basis of ethnic background

the goal of fascists is to have a self-sustaining economy, so you can isolate yourself if needed

Liberalism frees the individual

why

Hence I am a liberalist in the mold of Winston Churchill

The individual is a mechanism of the state. Completely ignoring that aspect of our identity is unhealthy.

The state is a tool of the individual

The goal of fascism is whatever the State wants. The State is *everything* in fascism. Which is why it is so easy for the one in power to abuse it because they become the State and hence absolutely powerful.

In a free society, the state exists as a function of public need, not the other way around

Hitler claimed to BE Germany

Socialism lead to the same conclusion though

An individual is not the public.

And when he was about to die he wanted Germany to be utterly destroyed so that it would never recover

If you disagreed with Stalin you got disappeared

The public is a number of individuals

whay

We see the same cult of personality happening in China now as Xi consolidates his power

The state exists to weigh the power of individuals against each bother, and the public against individuals. Avoid mob rule and negation of rights

As Xi "becomes" China, China completes their mutation from a possibly nascent Communist state to pure fascism.

China was never Communist, just Socialist

Mao did believe in Marx. He, like Stalin, thought extreme measures were justifiable.

China is where evil won permanently.

Right, and you can be a communist leader of a socialist country

Now China isn;t even pretending to be working toward the communist paradise

But China was not Marx' end state