There are Cab drivers that don't want to carry blacks for example....

Didn’t need Quotes

well, in reality in the west it depends on the faction, one side has affirmative action everywhere and "whites last" cuz they're oppressors

Well I think any cabby is parking with the thought

and in the other faction you have equality

“Will this person mug me?”

“Am I going to get paid?”

“Are they going to annoy me?”

if im gona take a chance and maybe get raped, do i want it to be by a BBC

Phew I glad I’m not a woman

Well that depends on a variety of factors

Now I just need to defend my ass and mouth from other strange men

The foremost being do you like BBC?

since he said he wants it to be like that

i guess he likes BBC

Well, theyre typically left wing propaganda so no

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/24/us/politics/trump-phone-security.html is this total bullshit, or only partial bullshit?

rape by the british broadcasting channel

the only things people feel about BBC is intimidation, fear, pain and jealosie

said by conservative brits since 1924

Well when I’m phoning anyone the US is breathing down my neck

Its total bullshit afaik,

Trump says he prefers land-lines for phone calls, he hates mobile phones

And the moment we lose free speech I’m going to jail or getting heavy fines

And jesus christ, NONE of the abstracts or descriptions or titles are the same

Mobile phones are pretty nice tho

the page title is different from the heading is different from the metadata title

Like my phone is basically just a glorified itouch

the opening paragraph and subtitle are different between the page and the metadata

Has nobody been talking about the Trump - Putin arms race?

Idk

I’m gonna masturbate and do something else then write for my extended essay

"Steve Wynn, who owned a resort in Macau, is among the friends of Mr. Trump the Chinese hope to use to influence the president."

I mean what the fuck

Let’s reword it:

how do they make these rather extreme claims with total certainty?

The New York Times is literally saying they _know for certain_ not only what some U.S. officials have told them, but _what Chinese intelligence agencies intend to do in the future_.

“We think Steve Wynn, the owner of a resort in China, is the target of the Chinese government to influence President Trump”

This implies that NYT not only has access to top secrets, apparently kept about as well as air in a sieve, but to the internal mind and narrative of Chinese intelligence agencies

People talk. Even officials.

This harkens back to that chill time when the NYT unironically and unfailingly supported Fidel Castro's regime in Cuba.

It's happened throughout history that people talk when they shouldn;t