@wacka what benefit does the SA80 have over an AR-pattern rifle?

overall length is not that different from an M4

its probably why the UK arms companies sell £17bn worth to the US

ergonomics are considerably worse

they don't sell 17bn quid in SA80s to the US

17bn weapons in general

By the time they were designing these things, all of the patents applicable to the AR pattern were expired

ditto FAL

(which they were already using)

and the Steyr AUG

Merkel did not really win... last election was the worst result for her party since 1949 (which, obviously, was the very first election) and the only reason she did not lose more votes is that the leaders of the parties people voted for instead are... let’s just say they not good with their public image...

why was that the first election 😛 was hindenburg not elected?

She did stay in power though... so... she did not lose hard enough.

@wacka they also pussied out on the EM-2

Because the country did not exist before that... and something else...

so hindenburg was not chancellor of germany before hitler?

Thats semantics @wacka , like whats the number of current french republic.

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>

He was president of the Weimarer Republic, the current Germany was founded in 1949. Since the initial statement was about elections that is kinda important (different democratic... or undemocratic... systems)

In another context it would be semantics, yes.

I just landed in Greece and my phone provider messaged me "Welcome to Turkey!"

surprised to see scott adams just shrug about the gab thing.

I mean that may technically be true...?

So would there be Greece-y Turkey or Turkey Greece?

@Rabbi Shekels what you talking about

I think it's just some greasy turkey

@King Canuck nvm

Just found out recently Dankula is anti-lolicon. Kinda funny to see that is where his pride as an edge boi hit a dead end.

Though he does with it barely on principle:
https://youtu.be/NXo3IPwDtIY

Dankula hates pedos and child porn too much to make an exception for loli

Is it wrong to be against the sexualization of underage girls?

And I've never seen him advocate for banning loli anyway, people calling him a hypocrite are fucking retards

@Bookworm I wouldn't say that it's wrong but it is vunerable to the weakness of people going down the slippery slope. First it's underaged girls, then it's young women, then it's all women, then it's all PiV sex is rape. Then people end up as anti-sex Feminists.

Thing is has comprise his stance on loli on the principle that it is obscene fictional art

Not quite parsing that sentence, britian.

I dunno, the slippery slope thing doesn't make much sense to me because to me there is a strong, objective difference separating those different levels: underage girls are not biologically, sexually active.

I'm not aware of anyone who says it's morally wrong to be sexually attracted to a 16-17 year old girl, even if we condone laws that make a relationship with them illegal.

Have you considered that there are boys at that age that do become biologically, sexually active at that age?

I think we have two different stances of diction here, what does the word loli mean to you @Bookworm ?