Message from @A Haunted Army

Discord ID: 506779618951561217


2018-10-30 10:38:39 UTC  

I think this is just against anchor babies

2018-10-30 10:38:40 UTC  

i mean, citicenship based on parents is pretty common around the globe

2018-10-30 10:38:47 UTC  

not really, because the counteries the parents are from typically give the child citizenship anyhow

2018-10-30 10:38:47 UTC  

only if its back-dated... which I doubt it would be

2018-10-30 10:38:57 UTC  

you dont get german citicenship for being born in germany for example. or japan

2018-10-30 10:39:11 UTC  

But I'm not saying it will be back dated

2018-10-30 10:39:20 UTC  

doubt it

2018-10-30 10:39:23 UTC  

It will still question citizenship

2018-10-30 10:39:31 UTC  

how?

2018-10-30 10:39:39 UTC  

if its just to stop pregnant women crossing the border why would they back date it

2018-10-30 10:39:47 UTC  

thats more work and hassle

2018-10-30 10:39:53 UTC  

its to stop birth tourism right?

2018-10-30 10:39:57 UTC  

Let's imagine my great grand parents were not citizens and had children who were

2018-10-30 10:39:57 UTC  

it is

2018-10-30 10:40:06 UTC  

read the article itself Codes

2018-10-30 10:40:07 UTC  

"The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."

2018-10-30 10:40:23 UTC  

its gonna be for anchor babies

2018-10-30 10:40:26 UTC  

Well that law would make my parents have questionable citizenship therefore questioning my citizenship

2018-10-30 10:40:26 UTC  

or... more likely trump will do a trumpism and say "its back dated" ... then a few months later say ok its not backdated... so the original thing is "not as bad"

2018-10-30 10:40:41 UTC  

thats only true if its back dated

2018-10-30 10:41:16 UTC  

if it isn't back dated, you're parents are citizens and their kids will be, and so will their's

2018-10-30 10:41:58 UTC  

Back dated or not a lot of people will question

2018-10-30 10:42:10 UTC  

And it's stupid to have that kinda precedent

2018-10-30 10:42:24 UTC  

if its not back dated its not affecting anyone

2018-10-30 10:42:27 UTC  

tahts literally how most counteries run citizenship

2018-10-30 10:42:32 UTC  

if your parents are legal residents, but not US citizens, then you WILL be given the right to citizenship

2018-10-30 10:42:36 UTC  

unless they are literally giving birth as its signed

2018-10-30 10:42:36 UTC  

i'm confused at wtf the problem is

2018-10-30 10:42:40 UTC  

said by the Supreme court itself apparently

2018-10-30 10:42:42 UTC  

The policy stems from the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment tothe United States Constitution. The 1868 text states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

2018-10-30 10:43:16 UTC  

Lots of people are born here to people with visas on there way to citizenship

2018-10-30 10:43:26 UTC  

And it would hurt those people too

2018-10-30 10:43:33 UTC  

it would not

2018-10-30 10:43:36 UTC  

no it wouldn't lol

2018-10-30 10:43:38 UTC  

It's just all around a bad idea

2018-10-30 10:44:04 UTC  

when they get citizenship, their kids will also get it

2018-10-30 10:44:06 UTC  

the article itself states "The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."

2018-10-30 10:44:34 UTC  

Which article?

2018-10-30 10:44:39 UTC  

from that tweet

2018-10-30 10:44:55 UTC  

And how does that change a the reading of 14th amendment