it is

read the article itself Codes

"The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."

its gonna be for anchor babies

Well that law would make my parents have questionable citizenship therefore questioning my citizenship

or... more likely trump will do a trumpism and say "its back dated" ... then a few months later say ok its not backdated... so the original thing is "not as bad"

thats only true if its back dated

if it isn't back dated, you're parents are citizens and their kids will be, and so will their's

Back dated or not a lot of people will question

And it's stupid to have that kinda precedent

if its not back dated its not affecting anyone

tahts literally how most counteries run citizenship

if your parents are legal residents, but not US citizens, then you WILL be given the right to citizenship

unless they are literally giving birth as its signed

i'm confused at wtf the problem is

said by the Supreme court itself apparently

The policy stems from the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment tothe United States Constitution. The 1868 text states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."

Lots of people are born here to people with visas on there way to citizenship

And it would hurt those people too

it would not

no it wouldn't lol

It's just all around a bad idea

when they get citizenship, their kids will also get it

the article itself states "The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."

Which article?

from that tweet

https://www.axios.com/trump-birthright-citizenship-executive-order-0cf4285a-16c6-48f2-a933-bd71fd72ea82.html

And how does that change a the reading of 14th amendment

last chapter

i think the key really is in "subject to the jurisdiction"

Also just becuase there is no precedent set yet

it doesn't

arguably none citzen aren't subject to the jurisdiction

You might just make one by going too far

its that the Supreme court already ruled thats the case, regardless of how people look at the 14th amendment

the supreme court ruled that children of permanent residents will get citizenship

But they never said people with non permanent residents wont

its people pointing that theres no precedent, saying that "therefore you don't have to do it"

Supreme court stuck to the 14th

Oh shit... the new chapter for "The Promised Neverland" was heart wrenching.

So by making this order you open yours up to a lawsuit

Now that is how you send of a character. T_T