Message from @Cody
Discord ID: 506780214450454533
read the article itself Codes
"The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."
its gonna be for anchor babies
Well that law would make my parents have questionable citizenship therefore questioning my citizenship
or... more likely trump will do a trumpism and say "its back dated" ... then a few months later say ok its not backdated... so the original thing is "not as bad"
thats only true if its back dated
if it isn't back dated, you're parents are citizens and their kids will be, and so will their's
Back dated or not a lot of people will question
And it's stupid to have that kinda precedent
if its not back dated its not affecting anyone
tahts literally how most counteries run citizenship
if your parents are legal residents, but not US citizens, then you WILL be given the right to citizenship
unless they are literally giving birth as its signed
i'm confused at wtf the problem is
said by the Supreme court itself apparently
The policy stems from the Citizenship Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment tothe United States Constitution. The 1868 text states, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside."
Lots of people are born here to people with visas on there way to citizenship
And it would hurt those people too
it would not
no it wouldn't lol
when they get citizenship, their kids will also get it
the article itself states "The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."
Which article?
from that tweet
And how does that change a the reading of 14th amendment
last chapter
i think the key really is in "subject to the jurisdiction"
Also just becuase there is no precedent set yet
it doesn't
arguably none citzen aren't subject to the jurisdiction
You might just make one by going too far
its that the Supreme court already ruled thats the case, regardless of how people look at the 14th amendment
the supreme court ruled that children of permanent residents will get citizenship
But they never said people with non permanent residents wont
its people pointing that theres no precedent, saying that "therefore you don't have to do it"
Supreme court stuck to the 14th
Oh shit... the new chapter for "The Promised Neverland" was heart wrenching.
So by making this order you open yours up to a lawsuit
Now that is how you send of a character. T_T
Which could create precident