Message from @A Haunted Army

Discord ID: 506778991932211201


2018-10-30 10:35:20 UTC  

Trumps thing

2018-10-30 10:35:23 UTC  

inb4 "both" 😉

2018-10-30 10:35:35 UTC  

@Cody and who do you think would want to punish adultery? Who benefits from marriage?

2018-10-30 10:35:51 UTC  

i bet dems think it will hurt trump... but I think it will get him more votes tbh

2018-10-30 10:36:02 UTC  

Its retarded

2018-10-30 10:36:12 UTC  

immigration is a pretty hot topic

2018-10-30 10:36:16 UTC  

the parents would punish adultery, cuz it lowers the value of the wamxn as a virgin, so they'll beat her to death for it

2018-10-30 10:36:29 UTC  

That will have far more consequences on actual citizens than non citizens

2018-10-30 10:36:40 UTC  

Also that's completely unconstitutional

2018-10-30 10:37:05 UTC  

Calling into question someone's citizenship is a bad idea

2018-10-30 10:37:09 UTC  

i think its only applicable to non-citizens babies

2018-10-30 10:37:35 UTC  

Yeah and at some point a lot of people had non citizen parents

2018-10-30 10:37:49 UTC  

doubt it will be back-dated.... probably only "from now"

2018-10-30 10:37:53 UTC  

And if their child was not made a citizen

2018-10-30 10:38:02 UTC  

to stop pregnant women illegally crossing the border

2018-10-30 10:38:08 UTC  

isn't this how most counteries do it?

2018-10-30 10:38:16 UTC  

Then a huge amount of people would have questioned citizenship

2018-10-30 10:38:36 UTC  

no they wouldnt

2018-10-30 10:38:39 UTC  

I think this is just against anchor babies

2018-10-30 10:38:40 UTC  

i mean, citicenship based on parents is pretty common around the globe

2018-10-30 10:38:47 UTC  

not really, because the counteries the parents are from typically give the child citizenship anyhow

2018-10-30 10:38:47 UTC  

only if its back-dated... which I doubt it would be

2018-10-30 10:38:57 UTC  

you dont get german citicenship for being born in germany for example. or japan

2018-10-30 10:39:11 UTC  

But I'm not saying it will be back dated

2018-10-30 10:39:20 UTC  

doubt it

2018-10-30 10:39:23 UTC  

It will still question citizenship

2018-10-30 10:39:31 UTC  

how?

2018-10-30 10:39:39 UTC  

if its just to stop pregnant women crossing the border why would they back date it

2018-10-30 10:39:47 UTC  

thats more work and hassle

2018-10-30 10:39:53 UTC  

its to stop birth tourism right?

2018-10-30 10:39:57 UTC  

Let's imagine my great grand parents were not citizens and had children who were

2018-10-30 10:39:57 UTC  

it is

2018-10-30 10:40:06 UTC  

read the article itself Codes

2018-10-30 10:40:07 UTC  

"The Supreme Court has already ruled that children born to immigrants who are legal permanent residents have citizenship. But those who claim the 14th Amendment should not apply to everyone point to the fact that there has been no ruling on a case specifically involving undocumented immigrants or those with temporary legal status."

2018-10-30 10:40:23 UTC  

its gonna be for anchor babies

2018-10-30 10:40:26 UTC  

Well that law would make my parents have questionable citizenship therefore questioning my citizenship

2018-10-30 10:40:26 UTC  

or... more likely trump will do a trumpism and say "its back dated" ... then a few months later say ok its not backdated... so the original thing is "not as bad"

2018-10-30 10:40:41 UTC  

thats only true if its back dated

2018-10-30 10:41:16 UTC  

if it isn't back dated, you're parents are citizens and their kids will be, and so will their's

2018-10-30 10:41:58 UTC  

Back dated or not a lot of people will question

2018-10-30 10:42:10 UTC  

And it's stupid to have that kinda precedent