Message from @Grenade123
Discord ID: 536943196224225281
Bribery is a thing.
I mean I have a photo of Ben Shapiro somewhere
why
Do u fancy him?
you don't pray to your secret shrine of Ben Shaprio every night before touching yourself? /s
I was gonna do a joke that no one would support the kids in a case
Then stop and post a photo of Ben in a furry costume
If i was rich. I would support the kid. I mean kids are helpless and the left show more of the bully aspect
kids have parents
Pewdiepie is going to avoid it
But I think his fans will spread and talk about it
So let’s see if pewdiepie is standing up for white nationalists on channel 4 today
"U do realise some ppl cant afford to sue"
high chance for pro-bono and possibly class action.
or contingency
If they are physically assaulted or harassment continues there is going to be a tip
although only against the larger corporate media
though that's more common in personal injury law
not the individuals on twitter
well, for the class action
Thanks for the addition grenade. But idk it all depends if the kid gets assaulted. That is if he does. Hopefully he doesnt.
there is a video of evidence refuting the claims. If they do not publicly issue a retract of their stories, there might be a strong case of them knowingly spreading lies with intent to damage or harm. And that easy to prove with screenshots of people's reactions on twitter. It goes basically like this: You claim A, video refutes A and proves B, people react violently to A, you now refuse to publicly retract A despite it causing violent reactions and being proven wrong. Therefore you are knowingly spreading lies with the result of attempted harm.
Well i understand but wouldnt he also have to sue twitter for enaging in such acts of threatening?
**All smiles#5659** just left the server.
**judge#9767** just left the server.
unfortunately no. This is an issue caused by section 230, the like only surviving section of the Communications Decency Act. It protects them as if they are a platform, rather than a publisher. A newspaper and book publisher are responsible for what they allow to be published, even if they don't write it. a Platform is not. This was originally to allow online platforms to censor foul language while not being held responsibly as if they were a publisher, despite them acting like an editor like a publisher does.
this is what allows them to censor people and then prevent you from suing them
they can sue the individual who writes these tweets, or press possible criminal charges for threats. Actually, i believe assault is verbal, these people might be guilty of assault. Rather than battery which is the hands on part. but i feel that might be hard to win.
Assault is both physical and verbal
Depending on how the verbal part is addressed. In this case it is.. Since ppl do want to harm him or express the kid into getting harm.
assault is threats of violence, battery is the violence itself
^
but colloquially speaking, assault is the violence
it's only legally that there's a distinction really
yes.
this is why people get charged with assault AND battery
rather than everything just being assault
in common parlance, there's "threats of violence" and "assault," which legally are respectively assault and battery
though in many states, that's not the case either
it's different everywhere
things always get weird once you get down to the state