Message from @Dan da Dad
Discord ID: 528187095412637726
it's not, we had a guy come in an try and make it one, I banned him and it has remained a bit of a topic as something to watch out for in future and be very clear that this kind of rhetoric is no welcome here
Cool I agree then but still kind of strange, its wrong for either a man or woman to commit that stuff. The answer to woman getting off lightly compared to men is to push for harsher sentences for women, not treating it all lightly.
yeah, I think everyone here can agree with that, lol
I hope so
if anyone tries to support that stuff you can tell me and I will ban hammer them into the stratosphere
As long as the bans are being done properly, that sounds fine by me
yeah, we had a big talk about it today, I didn't archive any of what the guy said so I will remember to do that next time first. ^^;
Something happened with bans?
yeah, quite the day of drama, lol, it's getting all settled down now though.
Dang, and discord drama had only just settled down in one of my other servers
I guess there is no sleep for the tired
It's 'No rest for the weary'
what did he get banned for can I ask? supporting what part? that it should be legal for adults to have intercourse with children?
@InsaneCaterpilla it is midnight for me
personal touch
Ok guys enough... This topic has been discussed to death, we have agreed that it is not acceptable to discuss it here, nor an issue the MRM want anything to do with
Suffice to say, *stop discussing it*
yeah, das fair
<:ping:412588348260220938>
iffy uhh
To be clear: <@&516181909554987038> and <@&524520077337559040> will be dealing with this. We will not allow that kind of behavior, and are determining policies to deal with it.
Moving on!
Alimony is going to cost more beginning in 2019 - https://redd.it/aa524h
i saw this, very disappointing decision. strongly oppose
@Men Are Human Rule 2.2 is messed up. Is doxxing acceptable if a person isn't part of a protected group?
No?
@Men Are Human 2.3 is weird. Concern trolling is a common accusation on the subreddit. Heck, I've been accused of that once. Is that ban on first offence worthy?
Oh oops
Sorry
Thanks for your input
😉
Another objection to 2.3. Do feminists qualify as malcontents?
The rule might be fine, but it needs some clarification IMHO
Good point. could you check 2.2 and 3 again?
"Infiltration" doesn't make it better. Perhaps "misrepresenting oneself" is what you're getting at here?
Just did some fixes
Good point
How about now?
Looks good