iffy uhh

Agreed @InsaneCaterpilla

To be clear: <@&516181909554987038> and <@&524520077337559040> will be dealing with this. We will not allow that kind of behavior, and are determining policies to deal with it.

Moving on!

Alimony is going to cost more beginning in 2019 - https://redd.it/aa524h

https://youtu.be/TPtLOoCYu14

i saw this, very disappointing decision. strongly oppose

@Men Are Human Rule 2.2 is messed up. Is doxxing acceptable if a person isn't part of a protected group?

No?

@Men Are Human 2.3 is weird. Concern trolling is a common accusation on the subreddit. Heck, I've been accused of that once. Is that ban on first offence worthy?

Oh oops

Sorry

Thanks for your input

😉

Another objection to 2.3. Do feminists qualify as malcontents?

The rule might be fine, but it needs some clarification IMHO

Good point. could you check 2.2 and 3 again?

"Infiltration" doesn't make it better. Perhaps "misrepresenting oneself" is what you're getting at here?

Just did some fixes

Good point

How about now?

Looks good

Trolling is specifically mentioned in 1.2 and 2.3.

which is slightly weird

but only slightly

I can get from the descriptions what is meant to be in each category

How do you find the second trolling entry now?

Good

I don't think I can find anything else

I've updated it a bit more to read "Serious trolling that goes beyond simply being rude. For example: spamming vast numbers of posts, negging the server itself, or other attempts to disrupt the server in a malicious way. Trolling does NOT include legitimate objections to our worldviews."

sure

Might move trolling to its own rule in 1

I wouldn't

I mean mild trolling

Like going 'this is dumb, lol'

We had a guy like that

Trolling particular users being thrown in with malicious stuff like personal attacks is great, it implies targeted stuff

Whereas trolling on its own can be interpreted rather broadly

Good point

That should be it then, unless you have any more suggestions?

Nope, I like it