But anyway I don't see what ti has to do with mensrights in the first place, hijack much?

I just draw a bit solid thick line over there and anyone who crosses that for me is just a big fat nope, never anything that could potentially put a child at risk, and if you are viewing as a "sexuality" instead of an illness, and also believe that viewing child porn is not harmful then extra nopes.

^

What does it have to do with mens rights though? Society is more *harsh against men committing those offenses than women, yes, but none are really acceptable socially or legally. Its illegal (on paper) for a man or woman to do that stuff.

What does it have to do with mens rights? Hows it a male issue?

it's not, we had a guy come in an try and make it one, I banned him and it has remained a bit of a topic as something to watch out for in future and be very clear that this kind of rhetoric is no welcome here

Cool I agree then but still kind of strange, its wrong for either a man or woman to commit that stuff. The answer to woman getting off lightly compared to men is to push for harsher sentences for women, not treating it all lightly.

yeah, I think everyone here can agree with that, lol

I hope so

if anyone tries to support that stuff you can tell me and I will ban hammer them into the stratosphere

As long as the bans are being done properly, that sounds fine by me

yeah, we had a big talk about it today, I didn't archive any of what the guy said so I will remember to do that next time first. ^^;

Something happened with bans?

yeah, quite the day of drama, lol, it's getting all settled down now though.

Dang, and discord drama had only just settled down in one of my other servers

I guess there is no sleep for the tired

It's 'No rest for the weary'

what did he get banned for can I ask? supporting what part? that it should be legal for adults to have intercourse with children?

@InsaneCaterpilla it is midnight for me

personal touch

Ok guys enough... This topic has been discussed to death, we have agreed that it is not acceptable to discuss it here, nor an issue the MRM want anything to do with

Suffice to say, *stop discussing it*

yeah, das fair

<:ping:412588348260220938>

iffy uhh

Agreed @InsaneCaterpilla

To be clear: <@&516181909554987038> and <@&524520077337559040> will be dealing with this. We will not allow that kind of behavior, and are determining policies to deal with it.

Moving on!

Alimony is going to cost more beginning in 2019 - https://redd.it/aa524h

https://youtu.be/TPtLOoCYu14

i saw this, very disappointing decision. strongly oppose

@Men Are Human Rule 2.2 is messed up. Is doxxing acceptable if a person isn't part of a protected group?

No?

@Men Are Human 2.3 is weird. Concern trolling is a common accusation on the subreddit. Heck, I've been accused of that once. Is that ban on first offence worthy?

Oh oops

Sorry

Thanks for your input

😉

Another objection to 2.3. Do feminists qualify as malcontents?

The rule might be fine, but it needs some clarification IMHO

Good point. could you check 2.2 and 3 again?