if you dont control these two everything practically doesnt matter

Or national power

corbyn for pm

Ahhh

Foreign as in different

Idk, just auth dis shit up with one party state fam

Hello and welcome, Mr. t r u e

ok

Mmmm

Hello and welcome, Jacko and Craixite

anime profile picture

No

Just

no

Suicidal anime nazbol

is that a rake?

doesn't look like a hammer to me

lol

Holy shit never noticed, Rake & Sickle, Agricultural Socialism

It's a window wiper

fucking gypsies

all they do is wash windows at traffic lights

anti-leaf-bol

leaves leave

Strasserist Gang

The problem with journalist selection is that in the modern world every youtuber can be counted as one. So it would be very difficult to vet it. Regardless I would answer yes if 1. it has a sufficiently big calliber of social impact and/or there was money involved.

agricultural socialism, with a rake and sickle sounds like an-prim-soc

anyway with the qotd I think there should be overwhelming evidence that they deliberately mislead the public then yes but if there is any doubts than they should have to retract their story but not be fired

If the social impact is big enough I would be fine with his loosing job just for not vetting the info.

sure

thats different

welp then we agree

thats one job vs "loss of their right to work in that field by law"

idk id just demote them to an intern or some shit or make them cover something stupid untill they got their shit together

there is tons of bitch work in journalism

well then we don't I guess.

but I would say it depends on the caliber of the issue.