Message from @Real Jacko

Discord ID: 524311989703540737


2018-12-17 19:18:26 UTC  

Open borders gang

2018-12-17 19:18:34 UTC  

Second referendum

2018-12-17 19:19:01 UTC  

Media, money, two things that should never allow a foreign power to get a hold of.

2018-12-17 19:19:15 UTC  

if you dont control these two everything practically doesnt matter

2018-12-17 19:19:21 UTC  

Or national power

2018-12-17 19:19:40 UTC  

corbyn for pm

2018-12-17 19:19:40 UTC  

Ahhh

2018-12-17 19:19:47 UTC  

Foreign as in different

2018-12-17 19:20:05 UTC  

Idk, just auth dis shit up with one party state fam

2018-12-17 19:45:14 UTC  

2018-12-17 19:46:08 UTC  

Hello and welcome, Mr. t r u e

2018-12-17 19:47:34 UTC  

2018-12-17 19:47:54 UTC  

2018-12-17 19:47:58 UTC  

ok

2018-12-17 19:48:07 UTC  

Mmmm

2018-12-17 19:48:19 UTC  

anime profile picture

2018-12-17 19:48:38 UTC  

No

2018-12-17 19:48:39 UTC  

Just

2018-12-17 19:48:39 UTC  

no

2018-12-17 19:48:52 UTC  

Suicidal anime nazbol

2018-12-17 19:49:45 UTC  

is that a rake?

2018-12-17 19:49:58 UTC  

doesn't look like a hammer to me

2018-12-17 19:50:26 UTC  

lol

2018-12-17 19:51:23 UTC  

It's a window wiper

2018-12-17 19:51:39 UTC  

fucking gypsies

2018-12-17 19:52:14 UTC  

all they do is wash windows at traffic lights

2018-12-17 19:52:44 UTC  

anti-leaf-bol

2018-12-17 19:53:08 UTC  

leaves leave

2018-12-17 19:54:19 UTC  

Strasserist Gang

2018-12-17 19:57:16 UTC  

The problem with journalist selection is that in the modern world every youtuber can be counted as one. So it would be very difficult to vet it. Regardless I would answer yes if 1. it has a sufficiently big calliber of social impact and/or there was money involved.

2018-12-17 19:57:46 UTC  

agricultural socialism, with a rake and sickle sounds like an-prim-soc

2018-12-17 19:59:51 UTC  

anyway with the qotd I think there should be overwhelming evidence that they deliberately mislead the public then yes but if there is any doubts than they should have to retract their story but not be fired

2018-12-17 20:00:56 UTC  

If the social impact is big enough I would be fine with his loosing job just for not vetting the info.

2018-12-17 20:01:22 UTC  

sure

2018-12-17 20:01:29 UTC  

thats different

2018-12-17 20:01:38 UTC  

welp then we agree

2018-12-17 20:02:23 UTC  

thats one job vs "loss of their right to work in that field by law"

2018-12-17 20:03:23 UTC  

idk id just demote them to an intern or some shit or make them cover something stupid untill they got their shit together