rule britannia

I'd say yes to the daily question, wilful dispersion of false information is a something that can be weaponized agaisnt a people or a state.

@The Big Oof my poor child... Journalists don't lie, they just leave out important information, intentionally create a false narrative out of thin air or twist truths for the benefit of their own personal political beliefs and worldview.

When Britain first at heaven's command

Mfw media has more power than the state

Open borders gang

Second referendum

Media, money, two things that should never allow a foreign power to get a hold of.

if you dont control these two everything practically doesnt matter

Or national power

corbyn for pm

Ahhh

Foreign as in different

Idk, just auth dis shit up with one party state fam

Hello and welcome, Mr. t r u e

ok

Mmmm

Hello and welcome, Jacko and Craixite

anime profile picture

No

Just

no

Suicidal anime nazbol

is that a rake?

doesn't look like a hammer to me

lol

Holy shit never noticed, Rake & Sickle, Agricultural Socialism

It's a window wiper

fucking gypsies

all they do is wash windows at traffic lights

anti-leaf-bol

leaves leave

Strasserist Gang

The problem with journalist selection is that in the modern world every youtuber can be counted as one. So it would be very difficult to vet it. Regardless I would answer yes if 1. it has a sufficiently big calliber of social impact and/or there was money involved.

agricultural socialism, with a rake and sickle sounds like an-prim-soc

anyway with the qotd I think there should be overwhelming evidence that they deliberately mislead the public then yes but if there is any doubts than they should have to retract their story but not be fired

If the social impact is big enough I would be fine with his loosing job just for not vetting the info.