Message from @Leohte
Discord ID: 683814697983803462
Subordination?
Aent the politicians meant to be leading departments and not the civil service
"It was claimed"
The whole article is "it was claimed"
So it's all bullshit.
I fucking hope the declassify everything and just let the media take it like Trukp did
there seems to be a coordinate campaign to basically ruin Priti Patel
yup
I dont see any reason for boris to back down
he shouldnt
> Health secretary Matthew Hancock told the BBC’s Andrew Marr that the government is not taking “anything off the table” when asked if emergency powers could involve shutting down entire cities
"questioning their capability and undermining their performance. "
this is the obvious key, shes kicking their arses into shape - we know the civil service was trying at every turn to hurt brexit
I'm imagining that civil service would need reform
I'm thinking of like a "control rod" type situation
Where middle management at some points should be pulled out a put in when government changes party
And have party middle management in agencies
That keeps political bias towards the party in power at bay
oh were we doing 9axes
well it's late but i have this https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/204370326866493440/663540341995208714/IeX3hprsQv4AAAAASUVORK5CYII.png
>38% Progressivism
<:disgusteng:595338918044500041>
not for long:)
Allah is hella gay
Muslims = owned
I don't see how you can be a homosexual and a Moslem
Hate some of the questions from this quiz. Too many are clearly lined up with a prescribed intent, and some just throw something in that skews any answer to the question.
@Lios I think that's the idea of the quiz tbh, unless you mean the prescribed intent is "good" or "bad" person by the creators idea
No, there are seriously questions in which whether you answer yes, it can mean numerous different things, of which no quantification to your position can be made. Point in the homosexual marriage question. It states "Homosexuals should not be treated equally to heterosexuals with regards to marriage, filiation, adoption or procreation"
Well, I think they should be treated equally in marriage, as there are financial benefits to most western nations when it comes to marriage. Filiation, what fucking choice do you have? Adoption, grey area. Procreation? They cannot procreate. The fuck is that even doing in the question? Where does it quantify your position on disagreeing or agreeing when that is part of it?
If all of those questions are meant to be tied together as agree or disagree, you reach a potential impasse on some points, and cannot answer the question
Not even as a neutral, as some points you fully agree or disagree
Just say "yes" because that is the correct answer
Fair.
Marriage should be explicitly between a man and a woman
