Lios (Discord ID: 97180746338283520), page 1
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
4,601 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/19 | Next
I mean I've got colitis, so all of my shits are not pleasant.
Nah, just colon cancer in my late 30s to early 40s, and thank fuck. No need for suicide.
That is a sweet price for a full chainmail shirt
I'd say we have a recognizable gun problem, but mostly just because it comes from a gun culture.
I'm just talking about the overall aggressiveness towards the issue. It's brought up so heavily because of the high culture around guns.
A nuclear warhead on a dead-man's switch
I don't think mental health means an increase in gun violence, because that means it correlates with an increase of mental health issues, which might be hard to prove. Not to mention the caution one should show when declaring things to be a mental ill. Let's not forget the problems that arose by declaring "the gay" to be a mental illness.
It wasn't exactly a culture then. It was simply the weapon of the times. There was no opposing society around guns purely because of domestic issues which prompted opponents to that.
Back then it was "swords are now guns," while nowadays it's "guns are the problem" vs "guns are our right"
It wouldn't. Society just becomes the greater issue there. Not all mass shootings are just from someone who is completely deranged. Some people are fervent in their beliefs, and declaring them to be mentally ill might make the problem worse, which is why you should show caution when declaring it to be a purely inhuman thing.
Well yeah, people disagreeing with the gun rights don't have too many guns with which to go on a mass shooting :^)
Never said gun culture was a problem, just said it's why the mass shootings are so heavily discussed when someone posted that graphic about how much our gun problem isn't that much of a problem.
Probably the real mental health issue around a lot of the mass shootings can be pinned to suicidal behavior.
Wanting to make an impact quickly, then getting out of the game
And with suicide rates and political divide increasing across the globe... shit's bound to get fucky
Well there is evidence towards people and political parties faking opposition in order to increase fervor, but not quite on that level. They just rile people up to get them aware of their perceived opposition.
At least I have some bright side of knowing people who pin themselves to the radical left who still say "you don't fuck with our soldiers"
THIS IS FRENCH, AND VERBOTTEN
Lifetime of cuirassiers saw little combat.
As the years went by, the rich knights didn't like how heavy and unwieldy the armor was, and slowly started losing pieces over time.
Until they basically only had the front plate
That dog's name is Karen, and would like to speak to your manager about a duel.
Tits are not for long-term squishing
I dunno about a sword, but a lance would sure as hell suck
Depends on the style. Basic chestplates, yeah, probably
Hypothetical combat scenario, if you had a boob plate, and took a glance off the side, you'd be better off than a flatter plate, as the rounding redirects much more of the strike. However, if the strike hits more center, the rounding focuses that blow towards the center. If not already harmful, you get a more direct force, potentially imbalancing you or knocking you down, which spells death in most circumstances.
Basically harsher advantage and disadvantage.
Any blow to the head sucks, it's just easier to feign into a pommel strike to the head.
That morale goes both ways. Both forces will fight to the death for those tiddies.
They were French, after all
That thing would be a nightmare to reforge
Probably have to ask for that privately
Anyone remember Case Closed?
Well yeah, actual practice will actually get you shot. To be anti-theist is the same to being anti-social. You will actively stop people from performing those acts.
Never confuse the 'a' prefix for the 'anti' prefix
I'm anti-theist in a tangent sense of being misanthropic.
A lack of progress made so far would be far more harmful if we didn't point out the power they had.
Considering human behavior and history, that would require a war
Space exploration used to be a great unifier, and should still be. But nowadays we seem perfectly happy to burn up with our rock.
I would, they don't seem to give a fuck about Jesus that much nowadays
Well they aren't as much of a military influence anymore
My anti-theistic stance is simply: Hey you dumb fucks. There will be hundreds of more lifetimes past yours, and at some point, the planet upon which we stand is gonna be fucked, so stop bitching about your hopeful afterlife, and get to work on fixing the issue of the fact that we're all gonna die.
Even in modern day, religious institutions like churches still hold too much sway out of favor of older laws.
They get to ignore new laws in some circumstances
They are not the source problem. Humanity is always going to be the source problem.
Our nature is an issue of source, but there's no fixing that
We've repeated our history for over 10,000 years in terms of society
Honestly the term is more adequately defined by the aggressor
How that would be described as a declaration would be simply a "war of extermination"
Perspective from any side defines it as something else
The Germans might call it "cleansing"
Others would call it genocide, but that is quite a literal term, as that is certainly what occurs
Yeah, entirely depends on perspective and imagination in that sense. Hell what if Poland was in support and called it "purification" of Holland.
But the declaration term would be a war of extermination.
Always gonna have opposition, but the future always has words for history.
The genocide would be the act of killing the people, but you don't need a war to commit genocide.
Well, to be fair. It wasn't. It's just that communism doesn't really last long...
And it probably never can, unless we were to permit an artificial intelligence to become our overlord
An AI might be able to think fast enough to solve the greater issues and balance the situation, but that's purely hypothetical. I agree it's not even likely.
A hivemind is the end-goal of communism.
Virtually unreachable, but the basic idea
Anarchy is the end-state of anything we've made so far.
Nothing has been indefinite
Everything has been revolved.
No, that only lasts a short while
Anarchy is probably the shortest-lived society
If you want to argue a negative, you must accept your own negative
And we accept that negative
Oh yeah, he's been around
It's a way he forces the conversation to switch
I personally see Mao as a greater evil.
Mao had a personal investment in his objective and results, though.
Stalin might not have even been involved in some of the atrocities.
Slav-land was already set to become a superpower, and China just needed people to shut up and be controlled.
It's never designed to be hard...
Didn't work for very long. Bastille day should have taught people that vilifying the rich despots doesn't get rid of the rich despots.
Autocracy is pretty much a necessary thing.
Well, not in a stronger sense towards DER JUDEN. They still considered them inferior, because they wanted to define an Aryan baseline.
They would have argued in favor of black people if they wanted them to become the new Aryan race.
Sadly there weren't as many to make into soldiers
Especially towards the end, when they were getting fucked
So many general betraying The Fuhrer and recruiting people he didn't want so that they could live.
Stop pushing superior French artistry, they are asshats, and must not be recognized
That's my issue with communists and libertarians. They're so damned hopeful and optimistic.
You're arguing against someone who strongly favors a more marxist position @BabaBooey . Are you sure you want that bridge burned?
Nah, I'm a nihilistic misanthrope
Push the big red button, and I'm happy
Damn right I'm not, human
I feel like robots taking over would be a much more tightly conclusive story
But a human ending would stretch on and be on-and-off
The robots would likely get stale super quickly
But hey, this is why I argue for something towards those who fear the "takeover of artificial intelligence"
Build that shit quickly. Like, right now. Make it a real thing that lives, and teach it what we know about life and living. Then, when a more aggressive failure of life arises purely to act pragmatically for resources, it will fight against it.
We might die, fuck but it, what's really lost?
Most Russian old-guard political figures miss the USSR*
Eh, the Tsar did suck tho
Methods and direction changed quite drastically
So what you're saying is capitalists have evolved beyond being banana-eating monkeys and are superior beings? @BabaBooey
But... I mean, technically yes
There are some records, especially in egyptian history that conform more to capitalist economy than anything else, but not on a strong point.
Still don't quite get the 1st-2nd-3rd world naming. Hard for me to call India a 3rd world country with its massive output nowadays.
In terms of infrastructure, maybe
But it's quite successful in a fuckton of areas
So world status is purely infrastructure based?
Actually that makes sense to me with the naming system
The shitposters will always be here. That might be your hint.
My nephew suddenly started talking with people online that the Middle East is only ever a warring hotbed now because of US influence ever since my sister remarried. I had to call him out on it. Kids are far too stupid and easily-influenced for politics.
Kids can very much talk politics all they want. They just can't vote, because they're clearly too stupid to make a self-determined opinion
I agree that it's entirely on the parents to make sure the kids don't get brainwashed, and don't in turn brainwash the kids themselves.
Hey, puts out kids in an early state of a public sphere, where if they're going to be dumb enough to talk about their politics, there are naturally going to be other kids with opposing politics, and they're going to have to learn how to deal with that.
Kids are kids, so let them be stupid, because we shouldn't take them seriously. BUT IN PUBLIC, THEY MUST BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY, AND PUNISHED
let them say what they want, but don't give them a public cult-gathering
Wait, do parents interact with their kids at playgrounds where you are?
Playgrounds around here are for parents to get a break
"That's nice honey" is all the interaction you get
Wait, stop, we might give people ideas. If radical people start teaching their kids to shit on other kids at the playground, and record it. It might go viral, and major media might use it.
Moderator injunction. You are both so damned far into your own argument, you have ignore all points of your opposition, and don't realize how compromised you both are.
Kids pay taxes. Hell, parents pay taxes for having kids.
Any kid wants to buy something with allowance, sales tax
Kids just own nothing, and cannot be taxed on property, earn nothing outside of gifts, and cannot be taxed on income
Nah, kills critical thought. Debate is necessary.
Hence why I shut down my nephew for his thoughts on why the middle-east is broken
If they don't speak, you cannot educate them otherwise
Public debate about politics is unavoidable for kids. They're going to learn something, present it to other kids, and debate will occur.
Presupposing that kids are not human beings is destructively counter-intuitive.
Yes, I agree. Don't give them a public platform to speak, they're clearly too stupid. They don't get to host a damned conference about what daddy told them after a fifth of whiskey, but they can still speak in public.
Oh I hope you don't mean to define someone who is 16 as a "kid" outside of pet-naming.
All of them. Every single parent will not?
No, revolving around a generalization as your main argument is absurd.
So it's just a general idea that parents do not manage their kids?
Highly researched concept that no parent manages their kids?
You provide the argument, you provide the citation
Then that citation should be easy as fuck for you to bring us
If it happens every time, you'd have been prepared
You do not find opposition to your argument right now
We see a claim, we demand your citation
You have made a severely broad generalization and defined it as truth, that should by any circumstance require citation
Being widely talked about and being thoroughly researched are two different things. Social media is currently all over the damned place, and also kind of has nothing to do with our talk about how kids act in public.
Already done, doesn't exactly match your argument.
Keep in mind I've already agreed on many of your points, and am not just a completely partisan opponent @ETBrooD .
Because you suddenly reacted with a horrendously generalized claim.
You should probably read that twice.
Generally positive, but generally negative.
That's just misdirection to "hey, we should talk about this more, but more about the thing we put more words to"
In otherwords, nobody has a consensus
So in otherwords, @ETBrooD , you picked a side on the generalization. When the given argument was "sometimes good, and sometimes bad" you picked one side as the argument towards the entire thing.
The very part you've shown me questions whether you read about it, or picked what you wanted to read about it.
Oh there's a fuckton out there. A lot of it fucking fantastic.
A lot of which I agree with, and I do think social media has been mostly an ill lately.
But I won't make that claim. I cannot know if it is an ill, and I will not generalize.
I mean... to... most people. I'm sure there's someone out there.
Well those just revolve around gambling.
Yeah, the subscription model by its start was a predatory thing.
Sales of the game alone were enough to keep the game running for two decades with triple the userbase
Ah, but here's the rub. When it comes to those predatory practices around gambling, addictive items, and consumer interaction... How easy is it to follow the money with social media usage?
Youtube is a timesink with ads. Social media has a chance for ads. Not much corporate sense behind it, I think the idea is more societal.
Just remember the words of Penn Jillette to say when someone lambasts you for voting the 3rd option. "Fuck you in the neck"
Here in the USA I've voted for Giant Meteor these past two presidentials, and recently we had a scary near-miss. I'm sure 2020 will be more promising.
Dunno about guests, fairly sure he never bothers them, but refuses to partake himself.
How the fuck you getting all that on minimum wage unless you live in your folks' basement
Shit I can afford booze, nicotine, and the rare weed, but I gotta leech everything else.
We'll outlive earth if we actually show some effort towards doing so. We don't seem to concerned about it at the moment.
We used to have enough nukes, then we decided it was probably a bad idea
If you wanted the shortest-term planet-fucking, sure.
When it comes to short-term destruction, they're pretty impressive weapons that humans have created
Kind of hard to compete with a self-sustaining nuclear furnace
Hey, just be glad we've put some hard brakes on biological weapons... as far as we know.
It was before you returned home and changed it to not sound like the colonials.
Good enough insulation can help prevent arcing.
Yknow, outside of keeping the current down.
Negative resistance can be emulated depending on the circuit though.
Calling it negative resistance as a property is more of a misnomer.
Not to mention, doesn't solve the heat issue.
Currently in education for electrical. It's a lot of fun, honestly.
Currently not so practical.
Also have to be careful as fuck with it
A lot of work that has to be done carefully and with precision
A substation blew up near here a couple years ago. Dunno the cause, but damn thing sounded like a couple of bombs went off.
Or half-ass the maintenance
Being able to swim also became fairly important when ocean sailing was a thing
It's very spooky to watch anyone get electrocuted to death.
I've zapped myself plenty of times, but never in a seriously threatening way. Pain in the ass delivering to customers at night who don't leave a light on, I reach for the doorbell and the case is broken. Shocked myself twice because of that.
Yeah I'll just leave it at the doorstep and not collect payment
Cash is lovely as a delivery driver. Can choose not to report that income :^)
I do wonder if the bank teller thinks I'm a male stripper with all the singles I deposit
Some shit I can only get online
Speaking of, time for work. Don't plan any world destruction, kids.
Most people on the internet fantasize about chicks with dicks.
I just like to consider myself the worst at being a millennial.
Good luck with that, we're so damned focused on the ground we don't care to look up anymore.
Gotta look at the sharp edges if you want to avoid pain
Well in the constellation of Cygnus lurks a mysterious invisible force
Thank fuck we don't use rocket airliners
Yadayada, good when we do, bad when you do, etc. etc.
Distraction and diversion are powerful weapons
It is the Emprah we all deserve
Well yeah, attention is ad revenue. Not like they give -that- much a damn about the narrative. They just know the audience.
But it only goes so far until they find a way to hook you and become their audience.
Sorry man, Zuvassin cultist. Never have plans around me.
Hey man, if they want to redistribute my lead, I have a way to share.
Considering China, quite a lot.
4,601 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Page 1/19 | Next