Jabba's Soapbox
Discord ID: 535029123383296011
10,682 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/107
| Next
you should be so lucky ๐
better this way in case purges happen - can't afford to lose my other stuff because some morons want to deplatform any discourse they don't like.
nope, I've never said anything inappropriate - but if Discord decide to ban the server on an SJW whim one day, they have a habit of deleting all member accounts too
...and I have too many important things on my main account to risk
so I'm putting all political chat into this alt account
indeed - hopefully it never comes to crisis point, but freedom of speech isn't exactly on the rise
LOL, I just installed telegram yesterday
I've not had time to check how to find people, but maybe that's the point of it, hehe
that's what to call it... using your real name or your soy name ๐
I think that would be attempted suicide
mind you, could be talking about the suicide of a friend
If she's from Wales, then she'll have at least one friend that topped themself
train wreck or tranny wreck... hard to tell with the kids these days
just part and parcel of modern life, eh Sadiq, eh?
Hot off the press, behold the EU's latest declaration...
https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/press/press-releases/2019/05/09/the-sibiu-declaration/
"We will safeguard the future for the next generations of Europeans"
...depends how you define "Europeans" I suppose
damn, just remembered I have visitors coming at 3... shiiiiiii - better haul ass
Well, Maajid, that's nice and all that - but that's not how the law works anymore... now it's a racist hate crime if anybody says it is - motive isn't even considered anymore.
yeah, "It's not racist when we do it"
Hindus are not obliged to hide their hair... that red dot in the forehead is not Muslim, but Hindu ๐
***
anyway, I feel better after this...
https://twitter.com/josh_hammer/status/1126963069840760833
https://twitter.com/JabbaWithAPen/status/1127249063529852933
OUCH ! ! !
but they did walk away from it...
https://youtu.be/_aGua-oqPAM
oh, I forgot these... ๐ ๐ ๐
who the fuck puts cola in their whisky?
Bloody sacrilege.
mind you, you did say whiskey and not whisky... so I suppose you can do what you like with that Irish shite.
Yeah, the Tories will suddenly wish they pushed proportional representation after it's too late
I'm just fooling around - plenty of people over here spoil their drink too, but I always drink mine neat.
cheap whisky can be rough on the throat, so it's understandable that some people will use mixers with it.
well, the Tories have consistently fucked everything up since the coalition with the Lib Dems... there is no case for them, just a case against Corbyn.
@galesteppes can't find any overall graph, just localised stuff like this...
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Graph_showing_total_popular_vote_numbers_for_each_political_party_in_local_elections_in_Sheffield,_UK,_1973%E2%80%932011.jpg
well, she hot compared to Hillary
Melania has a better ass
I'm just catching up on this morning's politics shows... Andrew Marr, what a cock
LOL, Marr thought he was going to do to Farage what Andrew Neil did to Ben Shapiro... Fail ! ! ! The reason Marr failed is because he was trying to achieve a gotcha in bad faith - Andrew Neil was simply holding up a mirror to Shapiro and asking him to explain his hypocrisy.
I need to see the unedited version, but yeah, he showed how Marr was trying to get a gotcha instead of asking about the here-and-now issues facing us.
Ah, because Shapiro was being a hypocrite - that's what Neil was exposing
no, not at all, it was proper journalism
Neil was holding up a mirror to Shapiro and asking him to explain himself
The mistake would be to say Andrew Neil is in line with the rest of the BBC - and that's where everybody and their dog have got the exchange wrong with Shapiro
yes, it was all related to the subject of his new book
If Shapiro actually wrote the book, he was advocating for peaceful, harmonious discourse between political groups... Neil was setting out that Shapiro is very divisive in how he chooses to interract, which is hypocrisy.
and that's the problem, expecting everybody else to cow-tow to American definitions
Shapiro set himself up as an expert - he is fair game
I will probably do a video to explain how Shapiro fucked up so bad.
Incidentally, when I was watching it live, I thought Shapiro was partly justified - but when watching it again, it was actually worse
yes, when it provides context for how people choose to interract with others
yep, Marr totally in bad faith
who has criticised tactics?
tactics are part of warfare, not part of ideology
fairness is relative
yes, it's a tactic... but are all tactics acceptable?
Marr's tactics were flawed because he strayed from the facts to try to get a cheap win
No, the tactics are different... sticking to facts and not sticking to facts is a deviation in tactics
and Shapiro could have said that... but he didn't
fool
you seem to have a fundamental misunderstandin of what facts are
Shapiro did not retract, so it still stands
what part of BBC do I support?
stop talking out of your arse
Shapiro walked because his position had been destroyed
Shapiro could not explain his book after the hypocrisy of his own dialogue was juxtaposed next to it.
ok, I got better things to do with my time
you can't see beyond partisanship
no, it means I'm not going to get RSI typing longhand to explain to a Yank how real life works
right and wrong is a pretty good yardstick with which to live your life... don't knock it until you try it ๐
nope
but you too thick to see where your bias lies
Britain failed... nowe that requires context
got to raise money for the roof repairs somehow... or maybe just set it on fire like they did at Notre Dame
...and claim the insurance
here's a secret - EVERYBODY has bias - the trick is to see beyond it.
If Louisiana is so good, why do so many people call it a toilet?
city folk... that does sound likely actually
with a mosque on the top floor
yep, the bloody French ๐ ๐ ๐
not familiar with it in Britain - don't know about the continent
even Britain doesn't do that
prisoner vote
yes, after release
after release is already what happens in Britain - seems to work fine
It can sometimes give ex-cons a reason to engage with society... the criminals don't really do much voting in the first place
- street criminal...
...white collar criminals are a different story
I think they could have personal vote but be banned from any form of campaign/election involvement
They probably don't want to get very specific for fear of outlawing all the politicians, LOL
10,682 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/107
| Next