Message from @Space Force
Discord ID: 671933289396699196
the first one can hardly take 3 nades
and this time it took 2
and this time I yeet them both no problem
so inconsistent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WtzOHYi3CIk one of my favourite ost
Frostpunk is pretty nice
Can I shill my tismy game of champions then?
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL5X8WXJPCTU_WReyTrmmx9UoaBALK2t2N
Unfortunately its ran at around the same time as vampire
Nigma balls
whats Nigma?
nigma stole my bike?
Nigga Ligma
yeah the timers fucking rediculous
How long until the game is called racist?
Jesus tittyfucking Christ.
Warcraft 3 reforged has upset me
My Favorite game of all time
Was made even worse
ayyy
Even worse
oof
Apparently their ambitions got downscaled
A lot
Reminds me of the Watch_Dogs incident.
OK, guys, I need some help
I've designed a board game for children as part of my vocational training a few years ago. I'm trying to redo it, and I'm looking for input on how to make a balanced progression system.
The game is simple; you roll a die and progress on the board from start to finish. However, the twist is that the game is math oriented. The board should contain fields of four shapes (square, circle, equlateral triangle, astroid/star) and four colours (red, yellow, green, blue). The die is the D12, and has faces representing the four shapes, the four colours, and the numbers 1-4. Rolling a number progresses you the number of fields, while rolling a shape or colour progresses you to the next field of the same shape or colour.
Basically, you're teaching kids about maths, and accepting unfairness and defeat at the same time.
The thing is, how does one make progression balanced and varied? It probably should not have huge leaps (for example a roll of triangle or yellow should get you a maximum progress of about six), it should have a balanced set (that is, the numbers of individual shapes and colours do not differ much, or preferably at all) and it should not be too monotonous (like half the squares being yellow).
A related question is whether there exists a way to simulate gameplay (basically playtesting it with a computer). Easier to fix potential problems on a computer than an already printed board.
no
yeah, like I suspected, the internet becomes shit when you actually need it
and stupidly powerful when you dont
I guess it'll just be unbalanced then
it's not like kids know, but I will, and I will forever blame you faggots
I mean, I don't really know how that will teach kids about maths
they learn shapes, colours, and numbers
Ok