Message from @Reaps
Discord ID: 420266217819996194
Lol, that's ridiculous
These reviews are political af https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/death_wish_2018/
Rotten Tomatoes does it again.
First critic ""Death Wish" is a catechism for an audience terrified that their firepower and their influence are dwindling."
Can't get much more bald about it than that.
After bright got shitty reviews
It's time to ignore professional reviewers and watch the movie to make your own judgement
I look forward to the RLM review
What the hell how did I never hear about this movie. This looks insane.
Which movie?
Bright
It's quite good
@Fulcrum010 what’s the pros and cons of it?
it's a good and funny story
nothing life changing
@everyone
benny shap streaming live
let's see how much he hates the Oscars
hahaha
what a bunch of cunts
`The founder of modern Turkey, Mustafa Kemal Atatürk, is quoted on the front page of the 1 August 1926 The Los Angeles Examiner as denouncing the Young Turks and especially the CUP (the "Young Turk Party"):
These left-overs from the former Young Turk Party, who should have been made to account for the millions of our Christian subjects who were ruthlessly driven en masse from their homes and massacred, have been restive under the Republican rule. […] They have hitherto lived on plunder, robbery and bribery and become inimical to any idea, or suggestion to enlist in useful labor and earn their living by the honest sweat of their brow… Under the cloak of the opposition party, this element, who forced our country into the Great War against the will of the people, who caused the shedding of rivers of blood of the Turkish youth to satisfy the criminal ambition of Enver Pasha, has, in a cowardly fashion, intrigued against my life, as well as the lives of the members of my cabinet.`
Hence why I have him on my wall 🇹🇷
I need to get to one of Sargon's talks
Sargon of A🅱:b:ad
li 🅱 erali 🅱 m
`Section 230 says that "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider" (47 U.S.C. § 230).
In other words, online intermediaries that host or republish speech are protected against a range of laws that might otherwise be used to hold them legally responsible for what others say and do. The protected intermediaries include not only regular Internet Service Providers (ISPs), but also a range of "interactive computer service providers," including basically any online service that publishes third-party content. `
is that a typo? did he mean `Think 'hard'!`?
🔥
re bruenig