thanks gun cat

avatar

Shweed, just get on twitter anyway

doesn't matter what the cucks on the right and left say

@What Would Jack Conte Do? People on welfare are more incentivized to have children because they receive additional benefits for each child they have

@Shweed Solution: Eliminate welfare.

If the policy i proposed wouldn't pass eliminating welfare definitely wouldn't. There would be riots if you outright eliminated welfare. My proposed policy would atleast sustain those who are on it while preventing the birth of more future welfare recipients.

Yeah, sounds like a pipe dream that would cause more social problems than it solved

Elimination of welfare or My proposed policy?

Your solution

Its a bar cinvo solution

Convo

(there's an edit button dude lol)

I think it would be less than out right elimination of welfare, and the continuation of current welfare problem is just allows the problem to grow

What would be the non bar convo solution?

Eliminate welfare, or watch the system collapse.

Eliminating welfare would cause mass riots and watching the system collapse would lead to dumping of even more tax money into the system until we are all fucked

There needs to be a weening off period or we are fucked either way

This is an "is-ought" discussion right now

In plain english?

googled it you dont have to explain

Isn't the outright elimination of welfare the is-ought argument?

Doesn't my policy provide a path way to go from welfare to a diminished if not eliminated welfare state by not allowing people who require welfare to breed at above replacement rates

No, you're stating that welfare *ought* to be taken away slowly.

I'm saying that the welfare state *will* collapse. Either the welfare, or the state.

It *doesn't* go on. No one will ease the fall. No one will try.

Do you know how to invite people to the discord? And do you know what gets people's name on the right? Joined discord yesterday so im a noob

no u

?

Wouldn't any political policy end in an is-ought problem? could you give me an example of one that doesn't?

No, I can't. Most are.

It's policy, and rarely does it ever achieve what was intended

> Invites: Right click the server icon and select "invite people"
> Names: If they're permitted on the channel, they're on the list to the right. Even the offline members

Thanks

I think classifying any problem as is-ought is useless because it is antithetical discussing any problem to its logical ends. "It's policy, and rarely does it ever achieve what was intended" isn't this just a blanket argument against any policy that doesnt have any real world examples to consider

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zuzxyiHyrJ0
@meratrix some <:high_iq:382980759012638731> philly logic right here

the segment towards the end with the pizza shop owner is 😆

they cross the street, well shit

taxes are theft

"that kind of funding"

how about you cut spending you nonse

when bernie is telling you to stop taxation, you know you're fucking up

@AiarUther gotta justify that $121K salary somehow

:I