Message from @Deleted User

Discord ID: 360265691498020864


2017-09-17 04:38:34 UTC  

In a way that's true. Too much organisation creates a leverage in power which could be considered an act of aggression.

2017-09-17 22:08:56 UTC  

oppression isn't necessarily bad @Deleted User

2017-09-17 22:09:04 UTC  

acts of aggression are often justified

2017-09-17 22:09:14 UTC  

especially with criminals

2017-09-17 22:14:30 UTC  

Did not say they weren't.

2017-09-17 22:15:01 UTC  

Criminals being those who wish to dominate others.

2017-09-19 23:26:41 UTC  

@Deleted User woah, i though you were a NutSac

2017-09-20 00:25:50 UTC  

No, he is egoist now.

2017-09-20 00:25:56 UTC  

He used to be a communist.

2017-09-20 00:43:25 UTC  

Was he anarcho-primitivist?

2017-09-20 05:29:12 UTC  

Not that stupid.

2017-09-20 06:14:08 UTC  

>christianity is materialist
😨

2017-09-20 13:00:43 UTC  

Watch zizek squirm for 1 hour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OAWRinR6GM

2017-09-21 02:42:27 UTC  

Will offers a common Anarchist critique of praxis - 'what about action?'. This is not unique.

2017-09-21 02:46:19 UTC  

How will people get along without a government

2017-09-21 03:27:14 UTC  

That depends on what kind of theory you are talking about. For Anarchism, people would get along because all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed and in its absence people are generally cooperative.

2017-09-21 03:28:35 UTC  

But on the other hand, if you want to assume that people need a government to prevent them from killing each other, then what does that say about the human species? Do they deserve to be protected?

2017-09-21 03:29:01 UTC  

Either way, Anarchism makes man confront who he really is. There is a theme of justice here.

2017-09-21 09:09:45 UTC  

If you think dominance hierachies go away without a state that's cute

2017-09-21 09:09:55 UTC  

Those hierachies precede government

2017-09-21 09:16:29 UTC  

Of course. I never said they did.

2017-09-21 09:18:47 UTC  

In fact, I specifically used the phrase, when 'all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed'. This includes but is not limited to government.

2017-09-21 09:27:02 UTC  

And how exactly do you plan on achieving that?

2017-09-21 09:28:11 UTC  

you plan on changing human fucking nature?

2017-09-21 09:28:13 UTC  

good luck

2017-09-21 10:25:50 UTC  

An anarchist just uses praxis to resist authority. Methods vary. But engagement level is high, compared to say Communists who sole method is revolutions. Anarchism is more general and dynamic.

2017-09-21 10:27:46 UTC  

It may not ever be possible to destroy all dominance. But to some this is a plus, since you will always have something to fight against, and resistance to some is an ends in itself.

2017-09-21 11:28:34 UTC  

Name me a hierarchy you'd want to destroy and how you plan to do it

2017-09-21 11:29:33 UTC  

@Timo))) the Jewish Imperium, with lots of zyklon B

2017-09-21 11:29:35 UTC  

Like how would you prevent people from forming a religion which has its own hierachies

2017-09-21 11:29:40 UTC  

ebin

2017-09-21 11:54:52 UTC  

Here's a moral dilemma: "You're a muslim, and there is a woman who accidentally stepped outside of her house without her husband to pick up a dropped bag of groceries, now the crowd is calling for her execution and half of them want to stone her and half of them want to throw her off the building, how do you solve this?

2017-09-21 11:58:38 UTC  

stone her

2017-09-21 11:58:42 UTC  

more painful

2017-09-21 11:58:54 UTC  

this is what she gets for disobeying allah

2017-09-21 11:58:58 UTC  

But then you can't appease the roof crowd