Message from @Todd"ItWillWorkNextTime"Howard
Discord ID: 360394472753987594
That depends on what kind of theory you are talking about. For Anarchism, people would get along because all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed and in its absence people are generally cooperative.
But on the other hand, if you want to assume that people need a government to prevent them from killing each other, then what does that say about the human species? Do they deserve to be protected?
Either way, Anarchism makes man confront who he really is. There is a theme of justice here.
If you think dominance hierachies go away without a state that's cute
Those hierachies precede government
Of course. I never said they did.
In fact, I specifically used the phrase, when 'all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed'. This includes but is not limited to government.
And how exactly do you plan on achieving that?
you plan on changing human fucking nature?
good luck
An anarchist just uses praxis to resist authority. Methods vary. But engagement level is high, compared to say Communists who sole method is revolutions. Anarchism is more general and dynamic.
It may not ever be possible to destroy all dominance. But to some this is a plus, since you will always have something to fight against, and resistance to some is an ends in itself.
Name me a hierarchy you'd want to destroy and how you plan to do it
@Timo))) the Jewish Imperium, with lots of zyklon B
Like how would you prevent people from forming a religion which has its own hierachies
ebin
Here's a moral dilemma: "You're a muslim, and there is a woman who accidentally stepped outside of her house without her husband to pick up a dropped bag of groceries, now the crowd is calling for her execution and half of them want to stone her and half of them want to throw her off the building, how do you solve this?
stone her
more painful
this is what she gets for disobeying allah
you need to appease both sides
hmm
throw her off a sky scraper
and then throw rocks at her as she is falling
^^
Bingo
@انتقام >22 members
big ounce is gay
big ounce is gay
@Timo)))#2103 Religion can be fought against easily with ideas. Anarchists get involved where they can. There is no master plan. Anarchists work autonomously in small affinity groups and at their own discretion. A lot of people are anti religious and there are many groups you can support and so on.
big ounce is gay
Remember when anarchists in Spain raped nuns, killed clergy and shoot Christ statues
Good
I am amoralist.
I think they'd do more than fight them with ideas
I mean some of the people I see in the street are so ideology possesed they'd turn to violence in order to ''smash hierachies''
And a religious idea might well be more powerful in an anarchist society than anti religious thought
Of course. Any mass organisation is a proto-hierarchy. That is the beauty of Anarchy. Every new formation of power is a new life task of absolute meaning put before you. It is as if you are a newborn Christian but you have a multitude of Gods to worship. How could you contain your zeal? Anarchism is maximum euphoria. Every action is a gesture of absolute worship. Praise is the resistance against power.
If there's no end goal other than to basically amuse yourself go pick up a sport