Message from @rnіzаm
Discord ID: 359842766962032650
Yes, there are some people so very uneducated as to be believe that socialism and communism have no difference, I've gotten hammered by a specific gay fascist on the issue because I still called myself a socialist. Which i was - I supported workers' holding the means of production in a makret economy, not a command economy. But they paint all socailists in that colour, don't pay them much mind if they can't get it.
As to the 'appeal' as you'd label it, it's not really an appeal. It's the truth and ugly at that.But I believe that the fascist state, when practiced properly and with a culture strong enough to support it, can do wonders in this world. Including securing positive freedom (freedom to meaning) while also stunting the growth of degeneration.
All 'round good.
Enjoy the shackles of nihilism.
leftypol gay
Quite.
Mass organisation is hierarchical.
yes chopin ?
@Deleted User Organization violates the NAP
In a way that's true. Too much organisation creates a leverage in power which could be considered an act of aggression.
oppression isn't necessarily bad @Deleted User
acts of aggression are often justified
especially with criminals
Did not say they weren't.
Criminals being those who wish to dominate others.
No, he is egoist now.
He used to be a communist.
Was he anarcho-primitivist?
Not that stupid.
>christianity is materialist
😨
Watch zizek squirm for 1 hour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OAWRinR6GM
Will offers a common Anarchist critique of praxis - 'what about action?'. This is not unique.
How will people get along without a government
That depends on what kind of theory you are talking about. For Anarchism, people would get along because all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed and in its absence people are generally cooperative.
But on the other hand, if you want to assume that people need a government to prevent them from killing each other, then what does that say about the human species? Do they deserve to be protected?
Either way, Anarchism makes man confront who he really is. There is a theme of justice here.
If you think dominance hierachies go away without a state that's cute
Those hierachies precede government
Of course. I never said they did.
In fact, I specifically used the phrase, when 'all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed'. This includes but is not limited to government.
And how exactly do you plan on achieving that?
you plan on changing human fucking nature?
good luck