yes chopin ?

@Deleted User Organization violates the NAP

In a way that's true. Too much organisation creates a leverage in power which could be considered an act of aggression.

oppression isn't necessarily bad @Deleted User

acts of aggression are often justified

especially with criminals

Did not say they weren't.

Criminals being those who wish to dominate others.

https://insurrectionnewsworldwide.com/2017/04/23/pure-black-an-emerging-consensus-among-some-comrades/

http://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/dr-bones-no-one-is-coming-to-save-you-comrade

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u-2rNZQVvQo

@Deleted User woah, i though you were a NutSac

No, he is egoist now.

He used to be a communist.

Was he anarcho-primitivist?

Not that stupid.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUjHUtQ_GQY

>christianity is materialist
😨

http://www.lacan.com/zizhegche.htm

Watch zizek squirm for 1 hour https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_OAWRinR6GM

Will offers a common Anarchist critique of praxis - 'what about action?'. This is not unique.

How will people get along without a government

That depends on what kind of theory you are talking about. For Anarchism, people would get along because all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed and in its absence people are generally cooperative.

But on the other hand, if you want to assume that people need a government to prevent them from killing each other, then what does that say about the human species? Do they deserve to be protected?

Either way, Anarchism makes man confront who he really is. There is a theme of justice here.

If you think dominance hierachies go away without a state that's cute

Those hierachies precede government

Of course. I never said they did.

In fact, I specifically used the phrase, when 'all dominance and hierarchy has been destroyed'. This includes but is not limited to government.

And how exactly do you plan on achieving that?

you plan on changing human fucking nature?

good luck

An anarchist just uses praxis to resist authority. Methods vary. But engagement level is high, compared to say Communists who sole method is revolutions. Anarchism is more general and dynamic.

It may not ever be possible to destroy all dominance. But to some this is a plus, since you will always have something to fight against, and resistance to some is an ends in itself.

Name me a hierarchy you'd want to destroy and how you plan to do it

@Timo))) the Jewish Imperium, with lots of zyklon B

Like how would you prevent people from forming a religion which has its own hierachies

ebin

Here's a moral dilemma: "You're a muslim, and there is a woman who accidentally stepped outside of her house without her husband to pick up a dropped bag of groceries, now the crowd is calling for her execution and half of them want to stone her and half of them want to throw her off the building, how do you solve this?

stone her

more painful