It's very convenient that at this precise moment you "had to leave".

Either way, you still don't seem to understand why it's very hard to believe that AH actually explained things correctly in his video because, as I said, he didn't set up his argument properly.

I don't think people who would watch his video for the first time without prior subject knowledge would understand what in the hell he was talking about and be able to repeat it in their own words.

The point is not whether his argument about g is correct or not, but whether he presented it correctly or not.

For that I only look at his video presentation alone.

Just like an author of a novel can't say "this is not a plot hole if you first read this other book I published last year" to handwave away an artistic failure.

Plus, your attempt at discrediting me is laughable. "you fail this time because you failed another time" yet another complete fallacy, you make me laugh.

How bad are you at logical fallacies, seriously?

In the uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom, the monarch (otherwise referred to as the sovereign or "His/Her Majesty", abbreviated H.M.) is the head of state. The Queen's image is used to signify British sovereignty and government authority—her profile, for instance, appearing on currency,[1] and her portrait in government buildings.[2] The sovereign is further both mentioned in and the subject of songs, loyal toasts, and salutes. "God Save the Queen" (or, alternatively, "God Save the King") is the British national anthem.[3] Oaths of allegiance are made to the Queen and her lawful successors.[4]
The monarch takes little direct part in government. The decisions to exercise sovereign powers are delegated from the monarch, either by statute or by convention, to ministers or officers of the Crown, or other public bodies, exclusive of the monarch personally. Thus the acts of state done in the name of the Crown, such as Crown Appointments,[5] even if personally performed by the monarch, such as the Queen's Speech and the State Opening of Parliament, depend upon decisions made elsewhere:
Legislative power is exercised by the Queen-in-Parliament, by and with the advice and consent of Parliament, the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
Executive power is exercised by Her Majesty's Government, which comprises ministers, primarily the prime minister and the Cabinet, which is technically a committee of the Privy Council. They have the direction of the Armed Forces of the Crown, the Civil Service and other Crown Servants such as the Diplomatic and Secret Services (the Queen receives certain foreign intelligence reports before the prime minister does[6]).
Judicial power is vested in the various judiciaries of the United Kingdom, who by constitution and statute[7] have judicial independence of the Government.

The Church of England, of which the monarch is the head, has its own legislative, judicial and executive structures.
Powers independent of government are legally granted to other public bodies by statute or Statutory Instrument such as an Order in Council, Royal Commission or otherwise.
The sovereign's role as a constitutional monarch is largely limited to non-partisan functions, such as granting honours. This role has been recognised since the 19th century.
The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 removed the monarch's authority to dissolve Parliament; however the Act specifically retained the monarch's power of prorogation.

Some of the government's executive authority is theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign and is known as the royal prerogative. The monarch acts within the constraints of convention and precedent, exercising prerogative only on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament, often through the prime minister or Privy Council.
The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements. However, a treaty cannot alter the domestic laws of the United Kingdom; an Act of Parliament is necessary in such cases.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known internationally as the UK Parliament, British Parliament, or Westminster Parliament, and domestically simply as Parliament or Westminster, is the supreme legislative body of the United Kingdom.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom is bicameral, with an upper house, the House of Lords, and a lower house, the House of Commons.
In modern times, real power is vested in the House of Commons; the Sovereign acts only as a figurehead and the powers of the House of Lords are greatly limited.

Hahaha... Wall of worlds

Gzus

Is this a leftist meme?

Probably

It managed to kill this channel for several days

https://tenor.com/view/tldr-didnt-read-gif-7234213

If it was leftist id think it would set the chat on fire rather than kill it...

Nim isn't leftist

<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>

Olleh

Who's awake

If abortion is ok, injecting heroin into the fetus ok, essentially doing many things that will harm the fetus development ok to do; why the hell is it illegal to CRISPR/CAS-9 the fetus?

Well, that can potentially help the fetus

You don't want that!

Gods I hate these bloody transtrenders and other social constructionists going on about "biological sex is anti-science, but non-binary fanfiction is the realz!"

Sargon does more damage with just a few of these pro-radical feminist videos to men and to the benefit of feminism than 20 of his antifeminist videos could even make up for

Radical feminist are the worst of all feminist and should never be overlooked for SJW's who are dumb and make noise.
https://www.rapereliefshelter.bc.ca/learn/resources/compulsory-heterosexuality-and-lesbian-existence-adrienne-rich-1980
Their hatred of the trans women is because men and they want separate spaces because they use those spaces to isolate vulnerable women and radicalized them into political lesbianism.

These shelters are run predominately by radical feminist to exploit them to make them hate men.

When these radical feminist are no longer distracted by the trans women they're gonna have all the time and energy to focus directly on men.

Why does he want to help them do that

Because he’s principled and he speaks his mind. I feel like that’s what he would say, and he would also probably say something like “It’s not about tactics or sides or being pragmatic, it’s about being principled”

What you’re saying, correct me if I’m wrong, is that we should leave the TERFs to die against the LGBTQ crowd because their still our enemy

Well, he agrees with the TERF’s on this topic and disagrees with the LGBTQ crowd.

And he’s a commentary channel, so he makes commentary.

@Black Knight Patriarch Yeah, and AFAIK those early screeching autists who'd do dumb shit--to women who were MRA's back in the 1990s--were more than likely TERFs

The TERFs are right about one thing: Biology. And that they have in common with the "Medicalist" / "Truescum" transwomen.

The issue of women's shelters being radicalisation hubs for feminism and political lesbianism is known, at least in our spheres. There was a great interview with Erin Prizzy some time ago about that very issue: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jnUwxxijr3g&t=27s

Feminists go for the traumatized by rape-women. What I call "Phallophobia" is a common reaction in PTSD and c-PTSD patients who were raped. Like the war veteran who gets triggered by fireworks, despite consciously knowing it's just fireworks, but it's similar enough to the drums of war, has a fear/trauma response, due to the amygdala operating on lower resolution and has its signal strength increased. Thus "similar enough" stimuli trigger the response.
The same goes for some (not all) women with PTSD from rape. Their threat-detection extents from "that one penis" (tool of the crime) to "all penes" to "all men, because they have a respective penis". Not all of those women fall into utter misandry, for some are simply mothers who find themselves unable to bathe their little boys, but don't hate their boys for it.
However, it is an attack vector for the feminist, misandrist ideology.
(Also why transwomen, of whatever state of transition, cannot go to a female trauma-unit 😛 - they usually have almost entirely female only staff there for this very reason. It's not the traumatizeds' fault. But that logic error can only be addressed after the trauma-therapy)

(on a sidenote, if the man's reading this: I'll attempt to set up the substar again next year, and then annoy everyone in the upper echelons again. Fell out of there since the patreon debacle)

One of Sargons first livestreams was an interview with Erin. She's was so fucking redpilled

@Neja "the TERFs are right about one thing: biology"

No these lesbians are delusional, and in denial of any biological differences concerning male and female behaviours.

behaviour is yet another layer already

the reason why they're so obsessed with women spaces is because they want to isolate women in their shelters where they radicalized them. That's what they are afraid of.