Message from @ETBrooD
Discord ID: 656413772465831946
Whiic is taking a little time off in the cell
@Monstrous Moonshine Too bad your explanation comes many hours too late.
You had a chance to prove that you're not a phony and you blew it. I'm not buying your excuse, you saw my comment.
What?
>Too bad your explanation comes many hours too late.
Turns out that people have other stuff to attend to irl lmfao
>You had a chance to prove that you're not a phony and you blew it. I'm not buying your excuse, you saw my comment.
Says the guy repeating the idiotic spiel regarding g, refuted in the same video he has linked multiple times (JF Gariepy is a scientist) and didn't understand the philosophical underpinnings of his own ideology when confronted in a debate a few months ago (Rothbard's justification of NAP and Anarcho Capitalism)
Projection is thy name
In other news,
> our new approach estimates larger FST values of 26% for native worldwide human populations and 23% for admixed Hispanic individuals, whereas the existing approach estimates 9.8% and 2.6%
More good news for Race Realism
> Wright (1978) calculated FST values under 5% indicate little genetic differentiation between populations, 5% to 15%, moderate genetic differentiation, 15% to 25%, great genetic differentiation, and above 25%, very great differentiation which is the threshold for subspecies (races).[67] Human continental population divisions fall at the lower end of moderate genetic differentiation (<10%), while demes and ethnic groups under 5%: "Hence, as judged by the criterion in the nonhuman literature, the human FST value is too small to have taxonomic significance under the traditional [definition of] subspecies".[68]
Rationalwiki BTFO'd by their own standard of evidence
How long has this debate been going on?
@Monstrous Moonshine You saw my question about g before you left, so you could've at least excused yourself so I'd know why you're not answering. But you didn't even do that. So now the point of the exercise is failed.
The point was to see if you actually know what you're talking about by having you explain it in your own words without delay so that you wouldn't reasonably have time to study g one more time before responding.
It's very convenient that at this precise moment you "had to leave".
Either way, you still don't seem to understand why it's very hard to believe that AH actually explained things correctly in his video because, as I said, he didn't set up his argument properly.
I don't think people who would watch his video for the first time without prior subject knowledge would understand what in the hell he was talking about and be able to repeat it in their own words.
The point is not whether his argument about g is correct or not, but whether he presented it correctly or not.
For that I only look at his video presentation alone.
Just like an author of a novel can't say "this is not a plot hole if you first read this other book I published last year" to handwave away an artistic failure.
Plus, your attempt at discrediting me is laughable. "you fail this time because you failed another time" yet another complete fallacy, you make me laugh.
How bad are you at logical fallacies, seriously?
In the uncodified Constitution of the United Kingdom, the monarch (otherwise referred to as the sovereign or "His/Her Majesty", abbreviated H.M.) is the head of state. The Queen's image is used to signify British sovereignty and government authority—her profile, for instance, appearing on currency,[1] and her portrait in government buildings.[2] The sovereign is further both mentioned in and the subject of songs, loyal toasts, and salutes. "God Save the Queen" (or, alternatively, "God Save the King") is the British national anthem.[3] Oaths of allegiance are made to the Queen and her lawful successors.[4]
The monarch takes little direct part in government. The decisions to exercise sovereign powers are delegated from the monarch, either by statute or by convention, to ministers or officers of the Crown, or other public bodies, exclusive of the monarch personally. Thus the acts of state done in the name of the Crown, such as Crown Appointments,[5] even if personally performed by the monarch, such as the Queen's Speech and the State Opening of Parliament, depend upon decisions made elsewhere:
Legislative power is exercised by the Queen-in-Parliament, by and with the advice and consent of Parliament, the House of Lords and the House of Commons.
Executive power is exercised by Her Majesty's Government, which comprises ministers, primarily the prime minister and the Cabinet, which is technically a committee of the Privy Council. They have the direction of the Armed Forces of the Crown, the Civil Service and other Crown Servants such as the Diplomatic and Secret Services (the Queen receives certain foreign intelligence reports before the prime minister does[6]).
Judicial power is vested in the various judiciaries of the United Kingdom, who by constitution and statute[7] have judicial independence of the Government.
The Church of England, of which the monarch is the head, has its own legislative, judicial and executive structures.
Powers independent of government are legally granted to other public bodies by statute or Statutory Instrument such as an Order in Council, Royal Commission or otherwise.
The sovereign's role as a constitutional monarch is largely limited to non-partisan functions, such as granting honours. This role has been recognised since the 19th century.
The Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 removed the monarch's authority to dissolve Parliament; however the Act specifically retained the monarch's power of prorogation.
Some of the government's executive authority is theoretically and nominally vested in the sovereign and is known as the royal prerogative. The monarch acts within the constraints of convention and precedent, exercising prerogative only on the advice of ministers responsible to Parliament, often through the prime minister or Privy Council.
The royal prerogative includes the powers to appoint and dismiss ministers, regulate the civil service, issue passports, declare war, make peace, direct the actions of the military, and negotiate and ratify treaties, alliances, and international agreements. However, a treaty cannot alter the domestic laws of the United Kingdom; an Act of Parliament is necessary in such cases.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, commonly known internationally as the UK Parliament, British Parliament, or Westminster Parliament, and domestically simply as Parliament or Westminster, is the supreme legislative body of the United Kingdom.
The Parliament of the United Kingdom is bicameral, with an upper house, the House of Lords, and a lower house, the House of Commons.
In modern times, real power is vested in the House of Commons; the Sovereign acts only as a figurehead and the powers of the House of Lords are greatly limited.
Hahaha... Wall of worlds
Gzus
Is this a leftist meme?
Probably
It managed to kill this channel for several days
If it was leftist id think it would set the chat on fire rather than kill it...
Nim isn't leftist
<:pepelaugh:544857300179877898>
Olleh
Who's awake
If abortion is ok, injecting heroin into the fetus ok, essentially doing many things that will harm the fetus development ok to do; why the hell is it illegal to CRISPR/CAS-9 the fetus?
Well, that can potentially help the fetus