Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 627660653158465547
<:think:604636148970553344>
"Muhammad was engaged to Aisha when she was only 6 year old and he was 51, and consummated the marriage while she was still prepubescent, aged 9 lunar years old"
so, so many things that don't matter. defaming a historical religious figure shouldnt be something you can be prosecuted for - its a blasphemy prosecution
Still can't prove they had sex.
Nor that he was sexually attracted to her.
Checkmate libs.
According to the records that we have of their religious texts and the life of Muhammed, yes he did have sex. Kids aren't necessary. It is supporting documentation.
that marriage was more real than a bullshit religion tbh
Youre defending blasphemy rulings.
Have you considered moving to france?
They even have a inquisitorial justice system
just like the one that delivered that ruling
fuck france, full of muslims
Personally dont care much about that
Blasphemy ruling, it certainly is not.
the legal system is more worrying
Did you not read the link I posted?
About the case?
I read it Weez. They decided that because all the information we have about Allah wasnt good enough for them
she was a criminal
Or even better, even though she was right by that info
she didnt say it
so criminal
They assumed guilt and made her prove innocence
that is why that happened
Don't make unsupported claims and call them fact.
There is support
thats not illegal
that sounds like religion
lying is not illegal in most circumstances
If I said to you right now "Neil armstrong went to the moon"
Should I be expected to give you a citation?
Okay, let me ask you, could you unquestionably *prove* that she defamed him?
What i say is correct even though it;s uncited
I accept it based on the research I've done
If I knew nothing then I would ask for a citation and evidence
Just leave already!
But could I be accused of lying if I said it without citation