Message from @Joshu
Discord ID: 627660020770930698
But, he did not.
This is one of the reasons im glad we are leaving.
The justice system, they presume guilt.
Not unless if having loads of wives was useful for other reasons.
why focus on islam tho, im sure catholic priests fucked more kids than mohammed
Like, being essentially slaves.
Once more
a pedo is a pedo if they have sex with 1 child as an adult
and then spend the rest of their life fucking adults
yeah but fucking kids isn't ok by the bible
Polygamy is a major thing. You can have many wives.
So why bother breaking a marriage at all when you can just marry again?
Cross that line once
and congrats
youre a pedo
yup, you cant unpedo
Did they even have children?
Can't revirgin. Can't unpedo.
Can it be proved they had sex?
No, there were no children.
<:think:604636148970553344>
"Muhammad was engaged to Aisha when she was only 6 year old and he was 51, and consummated the marriage while she was still prepubescent, aged 9 lunar years old"
so, so many things that don't matter. defaming a historical religious figure shouldnt be something you can be prosecuted for - its a blasphemy prosecution
Still can't prove they had sex.
Nor that he was sexually attracted to her.
Checkmate libs.
According to the records that we have of their religious texts and the life of Muhammed, yes he did have sex. Kids aren't necessary. It is supporting documentation.
that marriage was more real than a bullshit religion tbh
Youre defending blasphemy rulings.
Have you considered moving to france?
They even have a inquisitorial justice system
just like the one that delivered that ruling
fuck france, full of muslims
Personally dont care much about that
Blasphemy ruling, it certainly is not.
the legal system is more worrying
Did you not read the link I posted?
About the case?
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-12171%22]%7D
Here you are
I read it Weez. They decided that because all the information we have about Allah wasnt good enough for them