Message from @Joshu
Discord ID: 627661096051933208
Personally dont care much about that
Blasphemy ruling, it certainly is not.
the legal system is more worrying
Did you not read the link I posted?
About the case?
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-12171%22]%7D
Here you are
I read it Weez. They decided that because all the information we have about Allah wasnt good enough for them
she was a criminal
Or even better, even though she was right by that info
she didnt say it
so criminal
They assumed guilt and made her prove innocence
that is why that happened
Don't make unsupported claims and call them fact.
There is support
thats not illegal
that sounds like religion
lying is not illegal in most circumstances
If I said to you right now "Neil armstrong went to the moon"
Okay, let me ask you, could you unquestionably *prove* that she defamed him?
What i say is correct even though it;s uncited
I accept it based on the research I've done
If I knew nothing then I would ask for a citation and evidence
Just leave already!
But could I be accused of lying if I said it without citation
Then when asked to provide some, give it
And you won't have these issues
🙂
so in blasphemy cases, it is sufficient to not prove the claims are accurate. ok.
It is essentially criminalising someone for telling the best truith we know
but not backing it up
" for telling the best truth we know", ah but is it?
She got criminalised for lack of citation
That sounds like "The innocent have nothing to fear" when the KGB come knocking.
on a true statement
Yet she couldn't prove it to be a true statement
It does Slen
Like I said
And in this context, it's harmful.