so, so many things that don't matter. defaming a historical religious figure shouldnt be something you can be prosecuted for - its a blasphemy prosecution

Still can't prove they had sex.

Nor that he was sexually attracted to her.

Checkmate libs.

According to the records that we have of their religious texts and the life of Muhammed, yes he did have sex. Kids aren't necessary. It is supporting documentation.

that marriage was more real than a bullshit religion tbh

I can't find that anywhere. @Slen

Youre defending blasphemy rulings.

Have you considered moving to france?

They even have a inquisitorial justice system

just like the one that delivered that ruling

fuck france, full of muslims

Personally dont care much about that

Blasphemy ruling, it certainly is not.

the legal system is more worrying

Did you not read the link I posted?

About the case?

https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-12171%22]%7D

Here you are

I read it Weez. They decided that because all the information we have about Allah wasnt good enough for them

she was a criminal

Or even better, even though she was right by that info

she didnt say it

so criminal

They assumed guilt and made her prove innocence

that is why that happened

Don't make unsupported claims and call them fact.

There is support

thats not illegal

that sounds like religion

lying is not illegal in most circumstances

If I said to you right now "Neil armstrong went to the moon"

Should I be expected to give you a citation?

Okay, let me ask you, could you unquestionably *prove* that she defamed him?

What i say is correct even though it;s uncited

I accept it based on the research I've done

If I knew nothing then I would ask for a citation and evidence

Just leave already!

But could I be accused of lying if I said it without citation

Then when asked to provide some, give it

And you won't have these issues

🙂