Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 627661225958047774
About the case?
https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#%7B%22itemid%22:[%22002-12171%22]%7D
Here you are
I read it Weez. They decided that because all the information we have about Allah wasnt good enough for them
she was a criminal
Or even better, even though she was right by that info
she didnt say it
so criminal
They assumed guilt and made her prove innocence
that is why that happened
Don't make unsupported claims and call them fact.
There is support
thats not illegal
that sounds like religion
lying is not illegal in most circumstances
If I said to you right now "Neil armstrong went to the moon"
Should I be expected to give you a citation?
Okay, let me ask you, could you unquestionably *prove* that she defamed him?
What i say is correct even though it;s uncited
I accept it based on the research I've done
Just leave already!
But could I be accused of lying if I said it without citation
Then when asked to provide some, give it
And you won't have these issues
🙂
so in blasphemy cases, it is sufficient to not prove the claims are accurate. ok.
It is essentially criminalising someone for telling the best truith we know
but not backing it up
" for telling the best truth we know", ah but is it?
She got criminalised for lack of citation
That sounds like "The innocent have nothing to fear" when the KGB come knocking.
on a true statement
Yet she couldn't prove it to be a true statement
It does Slen
Like I said
And in this context, it's harmful.
They assumed guilt
she couldnt prove it wasnt blasphemy? right.
who really cares what the muslims believe anyways, we should just deport them to france and say fuck you
that means its ok to prosecute someone for blasphemy then