It’s unconstitutional

Nor should you

Well then your constitution is retarded

It’s pretty fkn evil tbh

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-falls-for-prank-call-during-radio-phonein-i-turned-from-remainer-to-brexiteer-after-a4245981.html

Lmao

It should be about conduct generally not just one company

At least Nigel handled the prank well lmao

there needs to be one law for all

If your argument is "facebook can adapt better because of their money" then you arguing against companies being able to gain a certain size

Wasn't that "Mark" guy constantly getting on LBC somehow?

Tommy would have threatened to kill the dude on the phone

How tf does he get in so consistently?

Don't bother with Tyche; it's a central planner, who believes the State needs to micro-manage every facet of institution throughout society.

He just spends his time calling I guess

@Indra_11 So are tax brackets unconstitutional, because not everyone pays the same percentages. It's the same principle.

Rule 1 of regulation should be try not to hurt the income of the companies and therefor the economy but I'd prefer it if Facebook didn't record my messenger voice calls

Make tax flat

Simple

And then sell that or whatever

Do not make tax flat

Tax does need to be flat

Wtf

or flatter

I'm pro flat tax ever since I planned out my future

And saw the kind of tax I'd be paying with a highly skilled job

Flat may be justice, but it's also gonna lead to communist revolutions.

That’s a sure fire way to fuck the middle class even more

You cannot fund public services by taking half your population out of paying tax, especially when globalisation is crushing wages down to the lowest common denominator

Tommy is just a working class thug, but he didn't deserve to be imprisoned for recording outside of court.

The middle classes are being fucked by globalism, PeP

Progressive tax is the wrong solution to the problem of "rich dont pay enuf"

Tax the rich don't try and stop people from becoming rich with middle class raping tax brackets

I totally agree with Coolitic

Rule 1 should, first and foremost, be the pursuit of not eliminating efficiency by throwing a market out of equilibrium, Sam.

This is why I want the tax-free allowance banished, and welfare replaced with a universal basic stipend

You should be taxing other things rather than using a progressive tax

It’s not that the rich don’t pay enough, it’s that they are rich enough to AVOID what they should be paying

Because of globalism, PeP

Depends on the regulation in question that is of course a rational argument within context

Cuz all it does is incentivize them to make money in other, untaxable means