Message from @Scale_e
Discord ID: 626379773194665994
You're point isn't wrong but it is representative of a trend rather then a rule
That assumes they've engaged in publishing, Eccles. If Facebook engages in publishing, as does Discord.
how to get women to send anything through phone
Get her to say "feet are not a sexual object"
Then reply with :
"ok then send me feet pics RIGHT NOW"
I never said harder to monetise, I said ban the sale of. If everyone can't do it, where's the issue?
I'd personally question the idea of regulation in relation to privacy to begun with
You know Facebook listens to and records your messanger voice chats?
Again. Facebook. Army of lawyers. They can adapt.
Startups can’t.
@Scale_e Make different laws for startups.
Easy
Can’t do that
They have economic scale on their side.
Case by case
That’s illegal
Indeed.
Not if you make it legal
You can’t make laws for specific companies
It’s unconstitutional
Nor should you
Well then your constitution is retarded
Lmao
It should be about conduct generally not just one company
At least Nigel handled the prank well lmao
there needs to be one law for all
If your argument is "facebook can adapt better because of their money" then you arguing against companies being able to gain a certain size
Wasn't that "Mark" guy constantly getting on LBC somehow?
Tommy would have threatened to kill the dude on the phone
How tf does he get in so consistently?
Don't bother with Tyche; it's a central planner, who believes the State needs to micro-manage every facet of institution throughout society.
He just spends his time calling I guess
@Indra_11 So are tax brackets unconstitutional, because not everyone pays the same percentages. It's the same principle.
Rule 1 of regulation should be try not to hurt the income of the companies and therefor the economy but I'd prefer it if Facebook didn't record my messenger voice calls
Make tax flat
Simple
And then sell that or whatever
Do not make tax flat
Tax does need to be flat
Wtf
or flatter