Message from @Scale_e

Discord ID: 626379710179573760


2019-09-25 11:25:08 UTC  

What you're describing is more of a trend at which point I refer to whom is making the regulations - boomer - politicians and leftists

2019-09-25 11:26:39 UTC  

Ok. Facebook is a hive of leftist scum and villainy, right?
I know it, you know it, we all know it.
Let’s say you want to start a competitor, and make it a right wing version of Facebook?
Now you can’t.
So you don’t bother making *any* platform.

Let’s say we make rules that make it harder to monetize the sale of data.
Ok. Facebook has a metric dick tonne of lawyers. They can comply with the law. They can adjust.
You? Wanting to start up a competitor? You’re new. You don’t have a tonne of lawyers. You can’t do that.
So you make something else.

Facebook becomes the only game in town.

2019-09-25 11:27:18 UTC  

You’re throwing a pebble at Facebook, and dropping a boulder on startups.

2019-09-25 11:27:28 UTC  

You're point isn't wrong but it is representative of a trend rather then a rule

2019-09-25 11:27:37 UTC  
2019-09-25 11:27:59 UTC  

That assumes they've engaged in publishing, Eccles. If Facebook engages in publishing, as does Discord.

2019-09-25 11:28:11 UTC  

how to get women to send anything through phone
Get her to say "feet are not a sexual object"
Then reply with :
"ok then send me feet pics RIGHT NOW"

2019-09-25 11:28:13 UTC  

I never said harder to monetise, I said ban the sale of. If everyone can't do it, where's the issue?

2019-09-25 11:28:22 UTC  

I'd personally question the idea of regulation in relation to privacy to begun with

2019-09-25 11:28:36 UTC  

You know Facebook listens to and records your messanger voice chats?

2019-09-25 11:28:40 UTC  

Again. Facebook. Army of lawyers. They can adapt.
Startups can’t.

2019-09-25 11:28:55 UTC  

@Scale_e Make different laws for startups.

2019-09-25 11:28:57 UTC  

Easy

2019-09-25 11:29:01 UTC  

Can’t do that

2019-09-25 11:29:01 UTC  

They have economic scale on their side.

2019-09-25 11:29:04 UTC  

Case by case

2019-09-25 11:29:05 UTC  

That’s illegal

2019-09-25 11:29:11 UTC  

Indeed.

2019-09-25 11:29:14 UTC  

Not if you make it legal

2019-09-25 11:29:15 UTC  

You can’t make laws for specific companies

2019-09-25 11:29:20 UTC  

It’s unconstitutional

2019-09-25 11:29:27 UTC  

Nor should you

2019-09-25 11:29:34 UTC  

Well then your constitution is retarded

2019-09-25 11:29:35 UTC  

It’s pretty fkn evil tbh

2019-09-25 11:29:38 UTC  

Lmao

2019-09-25 11:29:44 UTC  

It should be about conduct generally not just one company

2019-09-25 11:29:51 UTC  

At least Nigel handled the prank well lmao

2019-09-25 11:29:58 UTC  

there needs to be one law for all

2019-09-25 11:30:09 UTC  

If your argument is "facebook can adapt better because of their money" then you arguing against companies being able to gain a certain size

2019-09-25 11:30:09 UTC  

Wasn't that "Mark" guy constantly getting on LBC somehow?

2019-09-25 11:30:16 UTC  

Tommy would have threatened to kill the dude on the phone

2019-09-25 11:30:20 UTC  

How tf does he get in so consistently?

2019-09-25 11:30:25 UTC  

Don't bother with Tyche; it's a central planner, who believes the State needs to micro-manage every facet of institution throughout society.

2019-09-25 11:30:31 UTC  

He just spends his time calling I guess

2019-09-25 11:30:40 UTC  

@Indra_11 So are tax brackets unconstitutional, because not everyone pays the same percentages. It's the same principle.

2019-09-25 11:31:04 UTC  

Rule 1 of regulation should be try not to hurt the income of the companies and therefor the economy but I'd prefer it if Facebook didn't record my messenger voice calls

2019-09-25 11:31:09 UTC  

Make tax flat

2019-09-25 11:31:11 UTC  

Simple

2019-09-25 11:31:15 UTC  

And then sell that or whatever

2019-09-25 11:31:16 UTC  

Do not make tax flat