what do you mean by a private court lupin? Havent heard of something like that existing these days, or maybe I use a different term for it

@Αγωνιζῆς the term I think is private arbitration. An agreed arbiter is appointed within the contract itself. it's similar to a civil court dispute in its processes (claimant vs defender, being decided over by a third party), and can even make somewhat good TV (as demonstrated by the likes of judge Judy, judge Rinder, etc).

They don't deal with "criminal law", just civil disputes within contracts. However they also have a lot of advantages: faster & cheaper than the public system of courts, and more likely to be enforced in any jurisdiction than just a court ruling (partly because its contractually set).

Of course there are some flipsides to this: it requires you to review all your contracts before signing (which tbf you should do anyway), some places have less enforcement options than court judgements, and it is a lot harder to find a means of appealling the rulings.

Arbitration even stopped America going to war with England arguably. Twice. Once in 1795 and the other not long after the American civil war (England backed the confederacy).

Tbh arbitration was being advocated as the best alternative to a war in the early 20th century. President Taft was really onto something there. Shame he didn't really understand the game of politics.

Ah ye, I already thought you meant private arbitration,

Well, in many ways arbitration between states instead of war is quite common

There are many contractual international courts these days

And wars are out these days, the pc term is 'military intervention' now haha

Ugh. Yeah, or 'police action', which is now passe but was big in the cold War.

But arbitration done privately is still a part of the law, not apart from it. I'm not sure how anyone could see it otherwise unless they are unaware of it.

Daily reminder that pretty much all mass shootings are perpetrated by men. Coincidence? I think not! And you ppl continue to question the validity of feminists fighting against toxic masculinity... Disguising...

Self fulfilled prophecy more like....

Or did we forget that vegan chick who attacked the youtube complex?

Did you just assume their gender? What a bigot

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM because women don't have the balls to shoot a gun

*yes that is a pun*

Your making fun of a tragedy is truly despicable. Made only worse by the fact that we face a serious necessity to increase gun control in this country and your shenanigans don't help!

what does Swiss and/or Polish gun control have to do with anything?
<:Veemote:501103628883591188>

Smh, there *are* no borders. It's all just a fascist conspiracy to keep us divided! @wotmaniac

Like voter ID

<:hyperthink:462282519883284480> <:thinkgon:560211224923734026>

Fucking borders, dividing us by uniting us in an area, maaan.

If there’s only one Reich then there’s no need for borders

<:BIGBRAIN:501101491428392991>

America is not diverse enough, only through world conquest can we reach peak diversity.

<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

<:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM Everyone pretty much says they were neutral. Even the dutch. https://www.netinnederland.nl/en/artikelen/dossiers/overzicht/tweede-wereldoorlog.html

@TEABAG!!! And you're saying this in relation to?

They would have made alliances with other countries if they had their own governments- during WWII

Again, what is this in relation to that was discussed b4? I confuse

@Tonight at 11 - DOOM ```` Namely that the new ideal German is depicted as gleefully aggressive towards not only the passé, old German "bigot", but also explicitly towards foreigners who disagree with the new German "ordering" of the world. The people who end up being charged by the angry mob of... Liberated (?), degenerate new Germans, hold up placards with the faces of Dutch and Hungarian politicians... `````

I have no idea why they want to remain neutral either.

Ok. I'm still confused as to why this piece of information adds to that point or indeed detracts from it. I really confuse

This is back in WWII, or were you refering to present day?As I was thinking about the past and their present Dutch behaviour. I think that it is really hard to say if they have called the Germans bigots

I'm talking here about an early 2010s German propaganda video and how it depicts the "good German" of today as being faintly veiled aggressive towards any ideological opposition to the mainstream narrative. Including but not limited to foreign politicians from fellow EU member states. In the case of Hungary the ruling gov. in the case of Netherlands a preeminent opposition figure.

(The Netherlands managed to stay neutral in WWI by the way)

I really don't see what the behavior of the Dutch adds or detracts from this point. Be it historical behavior or alt History possible behavior.

I confuse

Fuuuuck, this is a good lecture (if somewhat idealistic at times) about Poland.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ig7RIdpHbUA

This probably fits here. A good reflection with more examples pertaining to why "anti-movements" basically suck.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hduhspP8Gcg

DVS makes good content overall, might wanna check him out.

Tell that to the anti-humanity movements 😂

I dont know where I stand on this and I want to debate it. On one hand has Britain the biggest role of its life to play. The other is that it has massive prices to pay on the process . What are your thoughts on Birain and Britain?
https://youtu.be/PcRhAHVCHOU