Message from @olev
Discord ID: 353327614619942923
But, alas
a state is not a nation.
A state is just the shapard and guide of the nation and folk.
Nationalism requires a state
@Anglican But yet, I have heard that the state is enemy of anarchists?
@olev There's a whole tendency called national-anarchism lol. What is more ironic if you read those anarchist authors like Bakunin who was a Russian nationalist and pan-Slavic union proponent you validate such opinions.
Of course it is.
I'm not an Anarchist
I'm actually pretty authortarian.
Syndicalism refers solely to economics.
When the revolutionary syndicalists took it over, they seeked to take over also social life.
By dismantling the state and establishing their own.
I rush through topics and tell myself I understand them, because it is easy to use fancy language to convince others that you know what you are talking about. My ego tells me it is sufficient but it really isn't. I'm really just a lazy moron with egotistical bias. Time to get real and stop shitposting. Look at me, I'm an idiot, point and laugh. Let's get it over with. I'm a fake.
Which they just called governence or somet shit.
If you believe nationalist anarchism exists, please explain what nationalism is
Nationalism is the support of a national identity.
This national identity can be linked to a lot of things.
But culture, ethnicity, and ideals are veyr popular.
It is upholding the culture of the nation, and promoting national interests, correct?
I'd say it'd be VERY hard to do it under a voluntary assocation.
It might as well not be something you even fucking attempt.
You can't
A state is simply way more effective at this.
Nationalism requires a state
Okay.
I'm not an Anarchist anyway.
I wonder how Kurds would fit with this.
They're nationalist and pretty leftist, from the Kurds of Turkey to the rather anti-statist Kurds of Syria who filrted with though of Bookchin an ex-anarchist. They also never really had a state.
@Anglican Skimmed through the wikipedia article on national syndicalism, and what I got was a few paragraphs about the origin, and a poorly sourced 2-3 paragraph section, which did mostly beating around the bush and did not give a conclusive definition of national syndicalism, so I cannot make much of an opinion about it.
All that I can say, is that it seems like the bastard child of syndicalism.
It's my ideology; it has nothing to do with how it's officially seen by the wiki.
I'm not a tolitarian. Firstly.
It's literally just a melding of syndicalist economics into a fascist society adn state.
Apparently it is anti marxist, which I find hard to believe.
Dude...
YOu're being retarded.
Marxism is international and atheist.
NATIONAL SYNDICALISM IS A FORM OF FASCISM
Marxism isn't atheist