Message from @leavethisbotnet
Discord ID: 476002579105579009
They definitely don't want 2 states
There are still people in power who do
but they don't want one either
Most of the right wingers openly say they do
Not sure what can be done with those millions new citizens after though
Really? As in, they are in favor of merging with palestine and granting them Israeli citizenship?
At least some say exactly that
Surely lots of people are concerned about demographics
Wouldn't that mean they recognize palestine as a state?
I mean, at this point one state the only viable solution, I'm just surprised the right wing would agree with it.
I mean a merger in business requires 2 companies
Palestine and Israel aren't companies
They are a country and a half
It's something between merger and colonization. The British didn't exactly ask the locals if they want to be part of the British empire.
**Alt4Loot#8506** was cleansed from the server.
Yeah. Basically taking the Palestinian territories is the complete opposite of recognizing the Palestinian authority
The Romans did something like that too, in the early times. They'd beat an opponent and sometimes they'd give them full citizenship afterwards.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcmnx6gJwMc
Ok this video was made by "The Jewish Home party", which is one of the big parties on the right, and they are currently in the government too. The video is from 2012 so I'm not sure how much has changed, but they propose a plan called "the partial annexation plan". In short they say they want to annex areas in the west bank with little Palestinian population (they say 48,000 Palestinians) and give all of them full citizenship, and let the rest be independent of Israel (though without a state of their own)
This was usually the case with their neighbors, who were usually the same race and same culture, so it did make sense, despite the times.
OUT OUT OUT
Hmm?
how does one refute the blind resume arguement?
I understand there are many different variables when this theory is applied in the real world, but that doesn't account for when these experiments are conducted in a vacuum
What is the Blind resume argument?
the idea that two identical resumes are submitted to an employer, but the one with the male name gets preferential treatment
the one with the female name is more often discarded in favour of the male name
i've not read the statistics myself, but it appears to be a study that sjws love to quote
Sjws also like the wage gap and the 1/5 "study"
Wouldn't the results be entirely dependent on external factors you can't account for without an extraordinarily large sample size of companies in various fields?
Males are more likely to spend more hours at work. Being a male indicates to the employer that they will work harder than their Female counterpart even if they have identical qualifications. Also women tend to be mothers so that may take them away from their work. @DecadeUK
Does this refute it?
I think so
I'm not statistician, or a person with any actual experience btw
Yes, Asian is right too
Men work more hours, take less holidays
Most women tend to require paid maternity leave, and work less hours
The Blind resume argument falls apart because GENDER IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PEOPLE.