@Mips No. It's the exact opposite of that

I mean a merger in business requires 2 companies

Palestine and Israel aren't companies

They are a country and a half

It's something between merger and colonization. The British didn't exactly ask the locals if they want to be part of the British empire.

**Alt4Loot#8506** was cleansed from the server.

Yeah. Basically taking the Palestinian territories is the complete opposite of recognizing the Palestinian authority

The Romans did something like that too, in the early times. They'd beat an opponent and sometimes they'd give them full citizenship afterwards.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fcmnx6gJwMc

Ok this video was made by "The Jewish Home party", which is one of the big parties on the right, and they are currently in the government too. The video is from 2012 so I'm not sure how much has changed, but they propose a plan called "the partial annexation plan". In short they say they want to annex areas in the west bank with little Palestinian population (they say 48,000 Palestinians) and give all of them full citizenship, and let the rest be independent of Israel (though without a state of their own)

This was usually the case with their neighbors, who were usually the same race and same culture, so it did make sense, despite the times.

looks like a salami method to me

https://twitter.com/SergeantFrisky/status/1026416650311090176

https://twitter.com/KSAmofaEN/status/1026241367922696192?s=19 https://twitter.com/KSAmofaEN/status/1026241377867321345?s=19
https://twitter.com/KSAmofaEN/status/1026242184222318593?s=19

OUT OUT OUT

Hmm?

how does one refute the blind resume arguement?

I understand there are many different variables when this theory is applied in the real world, but that doesn't account for when these experiments are conducted in a vacuum

What is the Blind resume argument?

the idea that two identical resumes are submitted to an employer, but the one with the male name gets preferential treatment

the one with the female name is more often discarded in favour of the male name

i've not read the statistics myself, but it appears to be a study that sjws love to quote

Sjws also like the wage gap and the 1/5 "study"

Wouldn't the results be entirely dependent on external factors you can't account for without an extraordinarily large sample size of companies in various fields?

Males are more likely to spend more hours at work. Being a male indicates to the employer that they will work harder than their Female counterpart even if they have identical qualifications. Also women tend to be mothers so that may take them away from their work. @DecadeUK

Does this refute it?

I think so

I'm not statistician, or a person with any actual experience btw

Yes, Asian is right too

Men work more hours, take less holidays

Most women tend to require paid maternity leave, and work less hours

The Blind resume argument falls apart because GENDER IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PEOPLE.

Isn't that a point for the SJWs though? We're always arguing for each case to be judged on an individual basis instead of on the merits of the group.

But we are arguing on the basis that no external factors matter

not at all. Individuals are different biologically due to their genders

@DecadeUK I used to be a recruiter, without fail no women

Over a factor of 12 why do I have more God Daughters than God Sons?

Not because REEEEE WOMEN

And the test is simply a male and a female with zero qualification difference

But because they lacked the skills

@DecadeUK males and females are different on average, theres no way to get around that

Its a biological fact that being a male indicates to an employer that they are more likely to work harder than their female counterpart on average