Martial law

friendly reminder that if the situation was hopeless, the propaganda wouldn't be necessary

https://youtu.be/boI_KMv1t5Q

Watch this before

YouTube censorship begin

Bro the 25th won't do shit

Its pointless

If he gets impeached

He can't run in 2024

That's why

Who's gonna impeach him

Nancy wants to

The dems want to, but it's not going to happen

The inauguration happens in less than two weeks, no way an impeachment will happen that fast anyway

You don't know the Democrats that well do you

He needs to declare Martial law already

No

Yes

Trump has just been "permanently" banned from Twitter.

its his own fault for not dealing with big tech while in office

It's all about spreading propaganda. Get the sheep to obey

Besides myself and my dad of course, I don't think any of you realize that he couldn't do certain things when you thought he should have. It would have ended up backfiring.

True

@Swampfox169 are you sure he'll declare Martial law

I doubt it now

Considering Pelosi kicked the impeachment into overdrive, Trump is already ahead of them. It's going to be a long weekend

I honestly believe that the Communists are suffering from target fixation.

It's called hell bent and determined

Same thing. They are so fixated on throwing him out, they are going to fly right into his Trump Card

Parler crashed

It's being overloaded

Unconstitutional

@luzaddamymind the attack on free speech

Martial law is unconstitutional to keep him in office

Not if it's a stolen election

Not really, though? As far as I know, the constitution doesn't have any provisions discussing any sort of protocol for "stolen election". Meaning, even if the election was stolen, that wouldn't make it any less unconstitutional - it just means that the constitution could use a new amendment, or something

Honestly kanye should take office due to both sides rioting

Furthermore, even if there was, there would need to be substantial evidence pointing to the election being "stolen" in the first place. Since every piece of evidence presented to the courts have been thrown out (officially speaking), such a provision wouldn't occur anyway

The evidence wax thrown out because of democratic judges

Okay, if that's what you'd like to believe, then let's say you're correct. It still doesn't change things from an official perspective - since the courts themselves have yet to **officially** accept any indication of significant voter fraud, then in the eyes of the **law**, the election was perfectly legal and valid.