i say we give BLM and the Farakahn types the south and wall that off, then watch the fireworks

right. so the next best thing is defining American identity as white, but with certain provisions for the other two groups that have been here since the nation’s founding

Theoretical discussions fellas

>thinks they are theoretical...

it’s kind of how Russia works with its minority groups

they have semi-autonomous republics within Russia

and agreements with the government

At the end of the day, our end goal is building White Identity. Whatever tools we need to do that in a productive manner are acceptable.

>in the ethnostate we’ll
<:pepe:359012488920039424>

who mentioned that?

how do I delete someone else's post

tell a mod if you think its that bad

@NateDahl76 not necessarily. It’s calling for a nuanced approach to different minority groups

@Sam Southern - TN If it’s mine I can go ahead and delete it LOL

bois that's a meme, not serious

so for some, you say “we want to live separately, but they technically belong here” and for some you say “they have no claim to this country whatsoever”

no other group has claim to the American Nation, no.

well, native Americans do. where are you gonna deport them? lol

"whites have no claim to this country" is the other side of that argument @Alex Kolchak - NY

Buy up their land as we've done before.

Idc where they go after that.

since we "took" it and were invaders ourselves

correct. we built the country as it is now

that’s the counter-argument

I’m talking mid-to-long-term strategy here, not ideology

Amerindians have no claim to the American Nation as they were conquered and sequestered into their own Amerindian reservations. Not a concern as long as we buy them out as we've done countless times.

@Alex Kolchak - NY How long does ones ancestors have to be here to be"native"? or are we just talking brown people with feathers, just...because...

Easy strategy that is proven to work.

I think some kind of nativist coalition wouldn’t be a bad way to go

Not right now, of course

but eventually I don’t think the idea is crazy

inhabitants of soil =|= inhabitants of the nation

There was no nation without whites.

First American was Snorri Thorfinnson change my mind

it was a bunch of tribes wandering around and killing each other

got the registry thing figured out

yeah, I get that. I’m saying the approach to native americans and blacks has to be more nuanced than the approach to post-1965 immigrants

that’s a fair point, no?

they aren't native americans. they are amerindians. don't cuck to the framing of the anti-whites

*Siberian immigrants

and no, I disagree that we should have a different approach to Blacks and Amerindians.

Before Whites this continent was AnPrim camping gang