Message from @Papa Pizzagate

Discord ID: 517035559030489108


2018-11-27 17:43:13 UTC  

HE'S FINISHED!

2018-11-27 17:44:12 UTC  

Put a fork in him boys, he's done.

2018-11-27 17:46:05 UTC  

Is there a more biting name that can get to his ego a little more lol

2018-11-27 17:46:34 UTC  

Seriously though, we have to walk the balance between legitimate and respectful criticism of Trump vs attacking him. Personally I don't find the idea of the dissident wing attacking the president to be productive to our aims.

2018-11-27 17:47:09 UTC  

Coulter does it pretty well. I wouldn't be any **less** respectful than her.

2018-11-27 17:47:10 UTC  

God his ego is so fragile

2018-11-27 17:47:41 UTC  

So no nickname more vicious than what we’ve come up with basically

2018-11-27 17:47:49 UTC  

@Papa Pizzagate Less *respectiful*?

2018-11-27 17:48:14 UTC  

Good catch, thanks

2018-11-27 17:48:21 UTC  

<:4dchess:439923932062154782>

2018-11-27 17:49:02 UTC  

As I understand it he takes private criticism well

2018-11-27 17:49:10 UTC  

@VinceChaos He's the billionaire leader of the free world who got to the top by bullying and overpowering his competition. The man objectively does not have a fragile ego.

2018-11-27 17:49:19 UTC  

I wish Stephen Miller had a Twitter

2018-11-27 17:51:05 UTC  

Assuming he even sees it, I doubt Trump will care what a half-dozen, ReactionAryan and TradGroyper1776 accounts have to say about his progress, especially given the huge wall (heh) of resistance he's up against - even in his own cabinet in some cases.

2018-11-27 17:51:45 UTC  

I’m actually going against what I’ve said before you’re right @Papa Pizzagate in a way but his ego is certainly such that he won’t listen to those who criticize him who have a point

2018-11-27 17:52:10 UTC  

That’s why we’ll get it to blue check marks

2018-11-27 17:52:16 UTC  

I'll give this back to you - he seems to care about his base

2018-11-27 17:52:34 UTC  

The best way to convince him is not to attack him, but rather convince his base.

2018-11-27 17:53:26 UTC  

I would imagine they're most of the way there already, especially on the damn wall.

2018-11-27 17:54:17 UTC  

It's probably more effective to rally the right **Against** the left - call those opposing the wall, traitors to our nation etc, get at rise out of the base, unite them, rally them against the left.

2018-11-27 17:54:43 UTC  

Attacking Trump makes us look petty, weak and sectarian.

2018-11-27 18:01:30 UTC  

lately i've been defending trump against those disappointed in him, but if i have to hear Donny talk about black jobs one more time...

2018-11-27 18:03:48 UTC  

It's all an act, honestly. Talking about black jobs helps make him seem "Not Racist" - you might not care about that, but guess who does - the American public.

2018-11-27 18:06:33 UTC  

It's not all an act anymore. He has objectively failed on his signature campaign promises. What's more, he's barely even tried to curb immigration. Trump may not actually care about black employment, but he's governing like a neocon either way

2018-11-27 18:06:59 UTC  

Constructively criticizing him may not work but absolutely warranted

2018-11-27 18:07:04 UTC  

White wamen care about POC unemployment rates and such

2018-11-27 18:07:36 UTC  

Trump can still unleash executive orders and try to at least fund the wall in the lame duck session, which is why his base needs to put pressure on him now

2018-11-27 18:07:50 UTC  

Maybe praise for the actions on the border recently is warranted

2018-11-27 18:08:15 UTC  

Instead of just counter signaling “it wasn’t bad tear gas”

2018-11-27 18:08:28 UTC  

I'd be curious to see the breakdown between white females and white males on their views on trump's colored shilling

2018-11-27 18:09:07 UTC  

I imagine he really does want to do something about immigration. I truly doubt he was lying during his campaign. That means there's something unseen stopping him. Same with the FBI attacking us but not antifa. The deep state must be far more powerful than we know.

2018-11-27 18:10:13 UTC  

I know a former CEO of a defense contractor who is similar to Trump in many respects. He has the sort of behavior similar to Donnie that is like “I’m super successful idk who the hell you are you shouldn’t be telling me what to do”

2018-11-27 18:10:35 UTC  

The problem is that he staffed his administration (other than Miller) with people who support immigration. His instincts are good, but they always talk him down from taking real action

2018-11-27 18:10:51 UTC  

Are we allowed to tell people outside IE about the cards, or is this our secret money maker?

2018-11-27 18:10:52 UTC  

I've heard the theory that he's not issuing EOs till he gets one more SCOTUS pick, because the 9th circuit would just instantly challenge him and SCOTUS isn't a guaranteed win for him just yet.

2018-11-27 18:10:55 UTC  

I wish he could tell us things like that. I hate not knowing @Nemets

2018-11-27 18:12:00 UTC  

The 9th will challenge him anyway. Any exec action will get reviewed. That’s why it needs to be done as soon as possible

2018-11-27 18:12:38 UTC  

Trump needs to bring in Kobach and get rid of Kelly, Nielson, and Mattis. I'm 100% certain Kelly is convincing him to back down on every budget veto threat "to keep the military funded"

2018-11-27 18:12:50 UTC  

@VinceChaos right, but if SCOTUS isn't going to support him it's dumb to do it now. It's a guaranteed losing move.

2018-11-27 18:13:14 UTC  

afaik the 9th can't do shit about him actually enforcing what he EO's as long as the people executing the EO are on his side. hence the importance of wholesale razing his staff and starting from scratch

2018-11-27 18:13:30 UTC  

Once he knows he'll win in the highest court, it's time to let the 9th circuit come at him.