Message from Myndrian in Nice Respectable People Group #general
Ya thanks APO216 totally agree
So to rouse people from a deep slumber of apathy one can kind of use rhetoric like using ancestors as a type of god figure
Or archetype and talk about they are betraying their ancestors
And then I don’t know where to borrow the same amount of zeal from say like Judaism and Islam two very zealous group evolutionary strategies
The idea of white people ever seeing their ancestry in a religiousesque level *before* winning, is nonsensical. It can be propogandized once in control, but it’s not going to work as a strategy *to* win
White Identity most likely will have to piggy back on a proxy to gain momentum
I think focusing on the physical dangers individuals face from multiracialism and forced diversity is a more effective way to awaken people than focusing on the spiritual aspect just yet. We're more inclined to turn non-religious people away by prioritizing the latter.
@Myndrian That may be true, but it only works on people who share the same religion or religious history. I don't think many Buddhists would be motivated by hellfire for instance. Only Christians or people with a Christian upbringing would be swayed by that. It's a strategy for the in-group.
I think the spiritual aspect is important when addressing the Jewish predicament
If you aren’t playing on a spiritual level when you’re fighting against the tribe you’re fighting from a weaker foundation
Also. I think many secular leftists have a repurposed version of Christian belief that has its own Good v Evil, Saints, commandments, sins, etc.
The left is literally evil. Notch gets it
They already speak in a zealous manner, just with their own secular political beliefs.
@⚡Clark⚡ the left and right dichotomy is the easy to read version of the actual political battle for normies. I really do see it as evil vs good, with varying levels in between
And that is mainly my point
Not that I’m spiritual
Mainly atheist/agnostic but I used to be mormon and realize my zeal was never higher than when I thought myself to be completely chosen by god
So that is my point. But there are definitely flaws in such a worldview I’m sure
I’m just kind of rambling but wanted to hear all your thoughts. I guess my main point is how does a secular ideology compete with religious like zeal? Cause in aspect I think generally they lose, but I don’t know much concerning history besides the Mormons definitely did concede to the US out west
Obviously a big secular group has tamed many religious groups
Sadly some people out there aren't able to discern between religiosity and spirituality. It's getting better though
The secular and even often anti-religiousity of the asian communist movements were quite zealous..
Definitely true. Do you think it’s cause communism is like crazy idealism? Aiming for this Utopia/pie in the sky/ heaven on earth?
So essentially heaven in a lot of ways
It’s probably difficult to delineate ideological/religious Utopianism, for the purposes of the strength of conviction
Heaven on earth = 100,000,000 deaths
It’s very important to distinguish “a desire for improvement” from “a desire for perfection.” The latter leads to some dark places when perfection never comes.
Especially when you try to establish heaven on earth top-bottom style ya
I'm chanting "WE WANT WALLS!"
I’m dying and going to heaven type belief is harmless ahah
@ophiuchus Also consider the desire for individual improvement versus societal improvement makes a difference.
Is saying "congratulations" an appropriate answer when you find out an acquaintance is jewish?
I didn't know what else to say
I’m always like “that’s cool”
In hindsight that probably would've been better.
I was nice about it and she smiled and said thanks, but couldn't hide those "is he patronizing me?" eyes
I just say "Oh wow, that's awesome!"
"weird flex, but okay"
I think the, "Utopia" as an ideal that happens almost immediately is false, and is used more as a lie to promote a evil ideology. One of them being Communism. I don't think an actual, morally sound Utopia would call itself a, "Utopia." Why convince yourself and others of what is already possible? You only have to convince others you're something that you're not, if you have something to hide.
I usually don’t say anything because we’ve generally long been knew by the point they tell you.