Message from @Uncivil Law

Discord ID: 787097448484831272


2020-12-11 20:19:03 UTC  

Dennis said they are live

2020-12-11 20:19:40 UTC  

Shouldn't the legislature have the ability to intervene in the certification process since they are the responsible party though? That would make sense to me. That as the Constitution says they have the express power to select electors they are the responsible party for the results to go through... Its some semantics I agree but these are things that sound like they should be checks and balances in line with other checks and balances built into the system

2020-12-11 20:19:56 UTC  

I dont see it though

2020-12-11 20:26:20 UTC  

When you dont see something. Doesnt mean stop looking so its not there.

2020-12-11 20:27:35 UTC  

@thebrodys the response was filed so its over to them.

2020-12-11 20:27:46 UTC  

If Congress has a power it's not just do whatever that power is whenever. They have rules in place from the Constitution and the state Constitutions and prior laws and rules set in place. Like the filibuster or senate majority leader these are just things Congress made up to put limits on themselves of how their body of Congress should work.

If they set a law like we increased the murder penalty from 10 to 15 years minimum and they want to change it back they have that power but they have to follow the rules to put it into law and get the governor to sign. It has to be in a session of Congress following the various rules to go through the process. They have the power to change how electors are granted. But in this case they need a special session to open up to make changes to laws already on the books. They have to follow the rules set in place to get a special session. Some of these types of protections were put in place by earlier state congresses to prevent the future versions of themselves from acting rashly.

2020-12-11 22:08:05 UTC  

Some of this Texas stuff is bonkers do they think this is compelling to a court?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/771201281024458802/787078279924154398/Screenshot_20201211-170657_Chrome.jpg

2020-12-11 22:43:06 UTC  

That’s not news

2020-12-11 22:44:21 UTC  

There’s been affidavits for weeks testifying to election workers curing ballots with fake names and dobs

2020-12-11 22:50:52 UTC  

Take away the electoral votes from these swing states. They will get their stuff together by the next election ..watch...

2020-12-11 23:18:57 UTC  

I am just waiting for the decision which I assume is coming later tonight

2020-12-11 23:19:22 UTC  

3-8 page per curim, texas go away

2020-12-11 23:19:30 UTC  

is my bet

2020-12-11 23:19:59 UTC  

@Dedkraken , for some arguments that information is useful. According to Wayne county's official results they published that is roughly the right number. I counted 172k that were absentee ballots that were cast in precincts that had 0 registered voters.

2020-12-11 23:20:43 UTC  

There were precincts with no registered voters?

2020-12-11 23:20:48 UTC  

That doesn't sound plausable

2020-12-11 23:22:44 UTC  

That is what their official results say.

2020-12-11 23:22:44 UTC  

@AquaCat, you just advanced to level 2!

2020-12-11 23:23:09 UTC  

What source are you looking at?

2020-12-11 23:23:56 UTC  

You must be misreading something

2020-12-11 23:24:15 UTC  

It seems very unlikely there are precinct with zero registered voters

2020-12-11 23:24:15 UTC  

Their county website has an election result pdf. I will need to go find it if you would like the link.

2020-12-11 23:24:38 UTC  

N/A is the voter turnout.

2020-12-11 23:25:37 UTC  

If the link has been labeled as unofficial, I have not seen that statement or report.

2020-12-11 23:27:56 UTC  

That looks right, but I need to look at it in detail to verify.

2020-12-11 23:29:30 UTC  

Should have Dr. Shiva analyze the 0 voter precinct. His math would point to Biden fraud, I'd wager heavily.

2020-12-11 23:30:44 UTC  

the way wayne county reported their election results was misleading. each precinct was broken apart into day of votes and absentee votes. each precinct showed zero absentee votes, when clearly each precinct had absentee votes. what they did was create new sections for the absentee votes, apart from their corresponding precinct, in this section they listed the number of registered voters as zero, presumably so the number of registered voters wasn’t duplicated, but that made it appear that the absentee ballots didn’t belong to a registered voter.

2020-12-11 23:31:09 UTC  

yeah that is what it looks like

2020-12-11 23:31:55 UTC  

you can see they report the numbers by precinct and separately by AVCB (absentee) seperatly for some reason

2020-12-11 23:32:18 UTC  

Damn. Thought that was the case cracker. Oh well. There are hundreds more which haven't been conjured out of thin air yet, I reckon.

2020-12-11 23:32:36 UTC  

If that is the case, why wasn't this fixed after the primaries?

2020-12-11 23:32:59 UTC  

I am not surpised. None of these numbers alleged in any state have panned out anywhere

2020-12-11 23:33:21 UTC  

rumors of places with 100%+ voter turn out and such

2020-12-11 23:33:29 UTC  

none of it pans out when examined

2020-12-11 23:34:33 UTC  

Those rumors persist to this moment. 700,00 Biden votes raining into arenas from access hatches. 'Why aren't people taking it seriously?"

2020-12-11 23:34:46 UTC  

rumors is not evidence

2020-12-11 23:35:04 UTC  

the evidence that has been submitted in cases has gone no where

2020-12-11 23:35:13 UTC  

It all falls apart

2020-12-11 23:35:23 UTC  

Preventing this issue seems very easy since the initial program should already take mail-in ballots into account. Why leave the issue unfixed? Why not replace the pdf with a corrected pdf?

2020-12-11 23:35:46 UTC  

this is correct, it is just the way detriot reports the numbers