Message from @Uncivil Law
Discord ID: 787097172373930004
Yes that's the problem 😂 you said it's not constitutional for the state Congress to make a system for the executive branch to administer which doles out electors based on voting results. This is not the case. In fact ideally they put something in place the does this.
Other election laws are related but different.
Any news out of SCOTUS?
Dennis said they are live
Shouldn't the legislature have the ability to intervene in the certification process since they are the responsible party though? That would make sense to me. That as the Constitution says they have the express power to select electors they are the responsible party for the results to go through... Its some semantics I agree but these are things that sound like they should be checks and balances in line with other checks and balances built into the system
I dont see it though
When you dont see something. Doesnt mean stop looking so its not there.
@thebrodys the response was filed so its over to them.
If Congress has a power it's not just do whatever that power is whenever. They have rules in place from the Constitution and the state Constitutions and prior laws and rules set in place. Like the filibuster or senate majority leader these are just things Congress made up to put limits on themselves of how their body of Congress should work.
If they set a law like we increased the murder penalty from 10 to 15 years minimum and they want to change it back they have that power but they have to follow the rules to put it into law and get the governor to sign. It has to be in a session of Congress following the various rules to go through the process. They have the power to change how electors are granted. But in this case they need a special session to open up to make changes to laws already on the books. They have to follow the rules set in place to get a special session. Some of these types of protections were put in place by earlier state congresses to prevent the future versions of themselves from acting rashly.
Some of this Texas stuff is bonkers do they think this is compelling to a court?
That’s not news
There’s been affidavits for weeks testifying to election workers curing ballots with fake names and dobs
Take away the electoral votes from these swing states. They will get their stuff together by the next election ..watch...
I am just waiting for the decision which I assume is coming later tonight
3-8 page per curim, texas go away
is my bet
@Dedkraken , for some arguments that information is useful. According to Wayne county's official results they published that is roughly the right number. I counted 172k that were absentee ballots that were cast in precincts that had 0 registered voters.
There were precincts with no registered voters?
That doesn't sound plausable
That is what their official results say.
@AquaCat, you just advanced to level 2!
You must be misreading something
It seems very unlikely there are precinct with zero registered voters
Their county website has an election result pdf. I will need to go find it if you would like the link.
N/A is the voter turnout.
If the link has been labeled as unofficial, I have not seen that statement or report.
That looks right, but I need to look at it in detail to verify.
Should have Dr. Shiva analyze the 0 voter precinct. His math would point to Biden fraud, I'd wager heavily.
the way wayne county reported their election results was misleading. each precinct was broken apart into day of votes and absentee votes. each precinct showed zero absentee votes, when clearly each precinct had absentee votes. what they did was create new sections for the absentee votes, apart from their corresponding precinct, in this section they listed the number of registered voters as zero, presumably so the number of registered voters wasn’t duplicated, but that made it appear that the absentee ballots didn’t belong to a registered voter.
yeah that is what it looks like
you can see they report the numbers by precinct and separately by AVCB (absentee) seperatly for some reason
Damn. Thought that was the case cracker. Oh well. There are hundreds more which haven't been conjured out of thin air yet, I reckon.
If that is the case, why wasn't this fixed after the primaries?
I am not surpised. None of these numbers alleged in any state have panned out anywhere
rumors of places with 100%+ voter turn out and such
none of it pans out when examined
Those rumors persist to this moment. 700,00 Biden votes raining into arenas from access hatches. 'Why aren't people taking it seriously?"
rumors is not evidence
the evidence that has been submitted in cases has gone no where
It all falls apart