Message from @Uncivil Law
Discord ID: 787099771352776744
There were precincts with no registered voters?
That doesn't sound plausable
That is what their official results say.
@AquaCat, you just advanced to level 2!
What source are you looking at?
You must be misreading something
It seems very unlikely there are precinct with zero registered voters
Their county website has an election result pdf. I will need to go find it if you would like the link.
N/A is the voter turnout.
If the link has been labeled as unofficial, I have not seen that statement or report.
That looks right, but I need to look at it in detail to verify.
Should have Dr. Shiva analyze the 0 voter precinct. His math would point to Biden fraud, I'd wager heavily.
the way wayne county reported their election results was misleading. each precinct was broken apart into day of votes and absentee votes. each precinct showed zero absentee votes, when clearly each precinct had absentee votes. what they did was create new sections for the absentee votes, apart from their corresponding precinct, in this section they listed the number of registered voters as zero, presumably so the number of registered voters wasn’t duplicated, but that made it appear that the absentee ballots didn’t belong to a registered voter.
yeah that is what it looks like
you can see they report the numbers by precinct and separately by AVCB (absentee) seperatly for some reason
Damn. Thought that was the case cracker. Oh well. There are hundreds more which haven't been conjured out of thin air yet, I reckon.
If that is the case, why wasn't this fixed after the primaries?
I am not surpised. None of these numbers alleged in any state have panned out anywhere
rumors of places with 100%+ voter turn out and such
Those rumors persist to this moment. 700,00 Biden votes raining into arenas from access hatches. 'Why aren't people taking it seriously?"
rumors is not evidence
the evidence that has been submitted in cases has gone no where
It all falls apart
Preventing this issue seems very easy since the initial program should already take mail-in ballots into account. Why leave the issue unfixed? Why not replace the pdf with a corrected pdf?
this is correct, it is just the way detriot reports the numbers
it is all there
There seems to be some confusion about that. Apparently the bigger the pile of garbage, the less garbage are the constituents of it.
In regard to what evidence is ^
Did SCOTUS just decline Texas
That is what CNN is reporting.
They should have let it stew until Monday before they punted.
WTF I don’t understand
They are calling it a dead end
Junk for several reasons. It's political theater. They know these things won't stand.
> 155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
> The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of
> complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of
> the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially
> cognizable interest in the manner in which another State
> conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed
> as moot.
> Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
> In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a
> bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original
> jurisdiction. See Arizona v. California, 589 U. S. ___
> (Feb. 24, 2020) (Thomas, J., dissenting). I would therefore
> grant the motion to file the bill of complaint but would not
> grant other relief, and I express no view on any other issue.
> They are calling it a dead end
@Anacaona Junk for several reasons. It's political theater. They know these things won't stand.
I can't find the opinion yet
got it