@DrSammyD WI did not say that you had to have CoVid to be designated as indefinite - they said that you had to be in a high-risk category.

@TaLoN132 like the article says, though, this was the first time for Georgia. here is from the affidavit of woman who saw pristine ballots:

The Democrats are dying in California. Gone are the days of gold.

@NoobDad Yeah.... GA admitted that they had issues with the primary. They made modifications for the general election.

You can read along: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/18632787/6/4/wood-v-raffensperger/

> @DrSammyD WI did not say that you had to have CoVid to be designated as indefinite - they said that you had to be in a high-risk category.
@TaLoN132

So if any of them left their house to go to a grocery store, they committed fraud?

@TaLoN132 wow! read it.

@NoobDad, you just advanced to level 5!

We are down to tier 3 in Chicago

She goes into more detail, like having to sign chain of custody even though the machines weren't there yet. She was also treated diffrently from other counters, and saw that they weren't following protocol

@NoobDad I watched her video. She seemed pretty credible. I would be interested in knowing more specifics. I know that there is a process that they use for fixing ballots that have been damaged - like if they got caught in a scanner and was ripped or if there was a problem when they took it out of the envelop. There is supposed to be a repair process that allows a bipartisan verification of the copying of the ballot choices onto a fresh ballot. I assume they would set these aside and process them all at once. If they were really identical, someone messed up or got lazy (the missing signature may be a clue). That might explain why fresh ballots were used and why this was an isolated incident. It is not necessarily indicative of massive fraud. While possibly reprehensible, its not enough to overturn an election.

Well it depends how many she saw. It was only 12k difference

But it's getting late, it was nice talking to you. Please watch this video, let me know what you think:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&t=183s&ab_channel=CDMedia

I'm hoping @RobertGrulerEsq comments on it.

Another thing to consider is that the Dominion Voting system is brand new in Georgia. She was apparently brought in for the recount effort, so she might not be as familiar with the new procedures. It definitely would not explain 98 identical pristine ballots.

They were not following protocol, though, so that's what concerns me, doesn't give me much confidence

It was nice talking with you, too. I look at this as an intellectual problem that needs to be analyzed. It's good to be able to bounce ideas off others that look at it just as critically from another perspective.

They raked Russell through the coals because his affidavit had some dumb mistakes.... ugh... but it has nothing to do with the video itself, he did a study on Texas elections when they were using the software. Very interesting!

He gets dirty with the details too. It's awesome

According to her video statement on YouTube, she found a single batch of 101 that had 98 for Biden (that seemed to be identical), 2 for Trump, and 1 for Jorgenson.

ahh i see

well goodnight!

Goodnight!

https://youtu.be/5BkW6DH83FQ

@CurlyNan, you just advanced to level 6!

I watched the video and here are my thoughts: this was aired on Nov 5th some 2 weeks ago, so there's been plenty of time for the lawyers to get what underlying evidence exists in front of the courts, the claims here are extraordinary and the video seems convincing but you can do that in a video when there is no opposing side represented, evidence in a court of law is different story and this is my sticking point ... lots of extraordinary accusations of widespread voter/election fraud but the evidence filed in court documents, so far, don't add up to huge buckets of ballots ... now a good portion of the allegations here and with Powell revolve around the notion that the computer software can reallocate votes for one candidate to another BUT they hand counted the paper ballots in GA and found not huge discrepancy so IF there was fraud it NOT in the software alone there had to be swap or additions to the paper ballots themselves which in turn would involve a lot more actual people than would a software only fraud ... what is that they say? you can only keep a secret if out of the two people that know it, at least one of them is dead

https://youtu.be/rZm8tlIE5t4

@mtpockets59, you just advanced to level 7!

@RobertGrulerEsq We also had an interesting question(s) yesterday regarding Associate Justices being appointed to circuit courts of appeals in certain key swing state districts by the chief justice. Particularly, the choice of which associate justice going to these states was an interesting choice to say the least. My thought is the Trump Legal team may attempt to bring some of their discarded lawsuits up to the appellate courts. Though I'm not sure how much influence associate justices have during the review process, it's certainly interesting. If I recall, ACB was already assigned to that district prior to becoming an associate justice, as her prior work was with the seventh circuit. It's something interesting to think about and keep in mind, if nothing else.

I also gather there is going to be an abundance of speculation from both sides of this.

Though I'd not call Roberts 'in the bag' for Trump.

Let alone most associate justices.

You'll probably hear a lot about this in the near future, as when I posted it I noticed a popup from a commentator directly referencing this. (Tim)

Not to mention: I don't feel the idea of some of these lawsuits coming back on appeal and somehow being flipped in these districts would sit well with the American public in the slightest. I personally think it's a lot of overreaching at this point as the deadline comes nearer.

I don't think associate justices can do much other than offer guidance and review from their assignments to these districts.

I could very well be wrong, but that's my understanding as a layman.

It's smart to associate their names in the hot spots (with whatever capacity they have to affect, which I don't know.) It takes claims of reptilian radical communist supreme court justice activists out of play. I am a fan.

I'd also be willing to bet that the only assignment that changed was ACB on that list, if it weren't the case, I think it'd be much more a cause for alarm.

Speaking of, let's see if I can get the last assignments.