They raked Russell through the coals because his affidavit had some dumb mistakes.... ugh... but it has nothing to do with the video itself, he did a study on Texas elections when they were using the software. Very interesting!

He gets dirty with the details too. It's awesome

According to her video statement on YouTube, she found a single batch of 101 that had 98 for Biden (that seemed to be identical), 2 for Trump, and 1 for Jorgenson.

ahh i see

well goodnight!

Goodnight!

https://youtu.be/5BkW6DH83FQ

@CurlyNan, you just advanced to level 6!

I watched the video and here are my thoughts: this was aired on Nov 5th some 2 weeks ago, so there's been plenty of time for the lawyers to get what underlying evidence exists in front of the courts, the claims here are extraordinary and the video seems convincing but you can do that in a video when there is no opposing side represented, evidence in a court of law is different story and this is my sticking point ... lots of extraordinary accusations of widespread voter/election fraud but the evidence filed in court documents, so far, don't add up to huge buckets of ballots ... now a good portion of the allegations here and with Powell revolve around the notion that the computer software can reallocate votes for one candidate to another BUT they hand counted the paper ballots in GA and found not huge discrepancy so IF there was fraud it NOT in the software alone there had to be swap or additions to the paper ballots themselves which in turn would involve a lot more actual people than would a software only fraud ... what is that they say? you can only keep a secret if out of the two people that know it, at least one of them is dead

https://youtu.be/rZm8tlIE5t4

@mtpockets59, you just advanced to level 7!

@RobertGrulerEsq We also had an interesting question(s) yesterday regarding Associate Justices being appointed to circuit courts of appeals in certain key swing state districts by the chief justice. Particularly, the choice of which associate justice going to these states was an interesting choice to say the least. My thought is the Trump Legal team may attempt to bring some of their discarded lawsuits up to the appellate courts. Though I'm not sure how much influence associate justices have during the review process, it's certainly interesting. If I recall, ACB was already assigned to that district prior to becoming an associate justice, as her prior work was with the seventh circuit. It's something interesting to think about and keep in mind, if nothing else.

I also gather there is going to be an abundance of speculation from both sides of this.

Though I'd not call Roberts 'in the bag' for Trump.

Let alone most associate justices.

You'll probably hear a lot about this in the near future, as when I posted it I noticed a popup from a commentator directly referencing this. (Tim)

Not to mention: I don't feel the idea of some of these lawsuits coming back on appeal and somehow being flipped in these districts would sit well with the American public in the slightest. I personally think it's a lot of overreaching at this point as the deadline comes nearer.

I don't think associate justices can do much other than offer guidance and review from their assignments to these districts.

I could very well be wrong, but that's my understanding as a layman.

It's smart to associate their names in the hot spots (with whatever capacity they have to affect, which I don't know.) It takes claims of reptilian radical communist supreme court justice activists out of play. I am a fan.

I'd also be willing to bet that the only assignment that changed was ACB on that list, if it weren't the case, I think it'd be much more a cause for alarm.

Speaking of, let's see if I can get the last assignments.

Oh, that would be interesting to see.

It will be fascinating to see the contortions necessary to put, say, Clarence Thomas next to Tucker Carlson on the list of Biden shills.

It appears to not be easy to get the prior orders for assignments.

Lol

So I really assume the most junior associate justices would be assigned to something, and RBG's assignment would be taken over in this order.

Good morning all! I'm rewatching this informative video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ficae6x1Q5A&t=183s&has_verified=1&ab_channel=CDMedia

It's a detailed security analysis of Dominion and Smartmatic. If you want to know the actual technical argument that will be posed by Sidney, you can check it out. I can also give highlights.

I wouldn't be surprised if Russell Ramsland, the consultant brought on to evaluate Dominion, is the reason why Texas is no longer using Dominion.

FYI: This study was based on a past election. He did a study where he compared logging messages from a Dallas polling station and a San Antonio polling stations. Dallas, predominantly republican, San Antonio predominantly Democrat. This apple to apple comparison was used to determine if the software was buggy

But as you can see, in Dallas, there were more inconsistencies then San Antonio

It led them to believe that something suspicious was going on.

So this is what they did. They took the entire log, and they start tabulating the votes themselves based on that. They would flag any transaction that didn't make sense. The table above displays their results.

These machines' source code has been reviewed numerous times.

Notice that the "Votes exceed ballots" is flagged 1027 times.

@Maw It's more complicated than that. There are multiple companies, multiple patches that can be executed.

It's not just one simple image that's baked into the machine

I mean, saying it's insecure is a lot different to saying it's intentionally set up to swap votes.

This is just the beginning of the video, lol