Message from @meglide
Discord ID: 779891014239518740
@Shaggy, you just advanced to level 1!
It shouldn't be, but it's shocking how ignorant talk show hosts can be. The GA election officials were 100% transparent. The hand recount was a way to more than accomplish the risk limiting audit, canvassing, and reconciliation. Part of the canvassing is making sure that tabulated votes match the number of voters. The "missing" votes were caught by the checks and balances built into the process. GA voting machines are not networked together, so they use thumb drives to transfer the voting data to the tabulation system. That is a manual process, which involves human beings. These human beings were working days on end in support of our democracy. Mistakes were made, but the process was robust enough to ensure that the mistakes were caught and accounted for. The fact that we might like the result, doesn't mean that there was malfeasance involved.
gg/kZQAWm9QPE
nvm wrong thing
why dont they use the fixed votes then
a georgia counyu yhat recounted didnt give the fixed vote but wastold to send in the election night numbers
listen to the whole thing its about a quarter way thru
Agreed. If every state were investigated there would be widespread panic. It is an incredibly convoluted process, rife with human error and carelessness, bad equipment, overworked staff, unrealistic deadlines, and most importantly...inconsistency of process and resources from state to state. There may be certain situations where someone tampered or crossed the line, but the poll workers are likely not to blame most of it. That is a crazy job, high stress, VERY detail oriented, not just sitting around checking ids and counting
https://youtu.be/7nuMe7DDnpY haven't watched this yet but it's bound to be good. Fan of both Tracey and Barnes (what is it with Roberts and youtube lawyers)
"One might expect that when
seeking such a startling outcome, a plaintiff would come formidably armed with
compelling legal arguments and factual proof of rampant corruption, such that this
Court would have no option but to regrettably grant the proposed injunctive relief
despite the impact it would have on such a large group of citizens.
That has not happened. Instead, this Court has been presented with strained
legal arguments without merit and speculative accusations, unpled in the operative
complaint and unsupported by evidence." https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057/gov.uscourts.pamd.127057.202.0_1.pdf
But... but... but but... the Kraken??? Where???
It's an invisible Kraken. That's my contribution.
Biden got more votes than there are people in some cities?
source?
(watching video)
About to watch Sidney on Newsmax. But I may know what he's talking about in your video if it's Michigan? I'll check after Sidney talks.
just a guy walking through a forest talking into his phone saying a bunch of stuff
@meglide, you just advanced to level 2!
one of the stuff was that Biden got more votes than people in some cities
I think he might be mixing up something, such as the total votes in some counties/precincts being more than _registered voters_, in places with same-day registration
and thus nothing to see
clark co nevada admitted vote tampering 160k ish vote in the county overturning a county election however those same corrupt ballets however counted for the president election
You should look into the nature of that one. You'll feel better. Promise.
It is quite well reported.
This is the most credible evidence of a "dominion" scheme I've seen so far. https://youtu.be/KIlI46HdqKg?t=2642
I still think Powell is full of shit, but this cracked the door for me.
I would like to see this data for other counties/precincts
And compare if it comes up with these patterns.
Also, Philadelphia deleted this data after the video was published
@realz I'm wondering if this might explain it. Apparently, Ramsland doesn't know the difference between MI and MN: https://www.mediaite.com/trump/ouch-trump-legal-teams-supposed-evidence-of-fraud-is-from-the-wrong-state/
rofl
To be fair, Michigan does end with an "n"
prime number theorem 👀
that seems interesting heh
It's a sneaky pattern, but it does exist in the data.
He's just very bad at explaining it