Message from @thebrodys

Discord ID: 781589327146516490


2020-11-26 18:28:57 UTC  

Also what is this β€œwhy would they ruin their reputation” question keeps popping up. The only reputation that matters is with the trump base willing to bail out anyone with tons of money if they speak on their behalf.

2020-11-26 18:29:26 UTC  

That's not fair. One thing we know for sure is that there is no such thing as a Trump zealot who would sacrifice their reputation for this.

there are not that many donors and patsies than biden would have

2020-11-26 18:29:58 UTC  

Is there even any standing to Sidney Powell's lawsuits in GA and MI?

2020-11-26 18:30:54 UTC  

The people named in the top of the lawsuit are the ones who need standing, no?

2020-11-26 18:31:43 UTC  

No that is what people are asking. β€œ why would they ruin thier reputation” referring to the witnesses. There is ample evidence to show that these the trump base will support anyone who puts their β€œreputation on the line”. It’s a express ticket to book deals, interviews and attention from a very loyal and almost cult like group. Nothing is really sacrificed here. They will just be regulars on trump tv and continue to make money of the trump base @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

2020-11-26 18:32:03 UTC  

it's kinda reaching, she maybe made a point to their vulnerability, but hasn't asserted if they have been compromised.

the second half I'll ignore off topic. The first half is political rambling nonsense ^^

2020-11-26 18:32:39 UTC  

Oh yeah. Guess I didn't think that through. Maybe there are rabid fanatics who would do that.

2020-11-26 18:33:00 UTC  

Also I’d like to see evidence of any lawyer being harassed , there was a election worker that had to go into hiding because of death threats from trump supporters. However lawyers of high profile cases are more than used death threats. @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

2020-11-26 18:33:05 UTC  

Was there even any evidence submitted in her claims? Will an evidentiary hearing take place?

the left can't meme there would be more than death threats if it was a right wing setup

2020-11-26 18:34:06 UTC  

That's important.

it will be revealed to the public if trump has won through court the evidence comes later, public evidence ^^

2020-11-26 18:35:18 UTC  

I think it's telling that so many of the "witnesses" are lawyers and local politicians. A lot of them are people that want to be in the game and want to perform well for the coach. In this case, the coach is local party leadership which controls the purse strings. Having shown that you are a good team player by trying to "save the day" looks good to the coach and the fans (voters).

2020-11-26 18:35:28 UTC  

@π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š you would be very naive to think the trump base would not support anyone that even alludes to take their fraud theories in stride. Being a right wing personality is the easiest gig it world. It’s the same as any church you already have a captive loyal audience to market too. The only ceiling of procuring wealth from them is dependent on how you make them feel. You then have free reign to just say whatever you want

2020-11-26 18:36:56 UTC  

Sure seems like equal protection had a major influence in deciding Bush V. Gore

2020-11-26 18:37:00 UTC  

@π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š that’s called hope , I guarantee when nothing of value comes out people will still think there was fraud. Evidence and proof not part of the calculus that goes into determining fraud. It’s already a forgone conclusion on trump supports minds

97% of R and 30% of D would still think it's fraud yeah ^^

2020-11-26 18:37:40 UTC  

Yes but not based on evidence

2020-11-26 18:37:48 UTC  

Evidence does not matter except in court

2020-11-26 18:37:53 UTC  

Where none has been produced

2020-11-26 18:38:04 UTC  

Lol random % claims. The court result will matter.

2020-11-26 18:38:36 UTC  

The court results will make no difference to trump supporters

2020-11-26 18:38:41 UTC  

If they rule against them

2020-11-26 18:39:05 UTC  

I bet it does to some. Indeed, we've seen that even here.

2020-11-26 18:39:21 UTC  

Sure there are some, not all

2020-11-26 18:39:44 UTC  

No, but we knew we would have to leave them behind at some point.

2020-11-26 18:39:54 UTC  

She claimed the CIA hack the machines before in other countries.. reason why he said in TV. That the intelligence agency is involved in this plot

2020-11-26 18:39:54 UTC  

@MatiLuc, you just advanced to level 7!

2020-11-26 18:40:01 UTC  

But the have to show that they have enough evidence that it is more likely than not to make their case. You wouldn't risk not getting to that point by laying out a circumstantial case without the connective tissue - if you actually have proof of malfeasance - just to wait to make you case in court. The last few weeks have shown that this is a bad strategy.

2020-11-26 18:40:22 UTC  

I think Trump winning a contingent election in House delegations will really harm him during the 2022 midterms