Message from @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

Discord ID: 781587382847799336


2020-11-26 18:21:17 UTC  

They were heard by the court already?

2020-11-26 18:21:41 UTC  

I thought they were trying to push all this back to dec or January

2020-11-26 18:22:24 UTC  

Give them time to concoct some ridiculous argument meant to further stall

2020-11-26 18:22:56 UTC  

Even r and r is saying that this isn’t about any real evidence

2020-11-26 18:23:06 UTC  

It’s just to find some long shot way to kick it to congress

or to go into a court case filled with ways to not be denied till they're forced to investigate and be driven to discoviering collusion ^^

2020-11-26 18:24:24 UTC  

That’s just the pretense

2020-11-26 18:24:27 UTC  

I have been pouring over the GA filing as I get time... I'm still not through the whole thing yet. I still haven't found the proof that Powell promised. It seems that she is taking a multipronged "throw everything against the wall" approach. The first part is a multi-tiered circumstantial case. She seems to use a circumstantial relationship between Smartmatic and Dominion (which many have debunked pretty thoroughly) - even if the Sequoia transactions were part of some plot to share dubious code across all platforms, there is no direct proof that it happened. Also, previously identified potential vulnerabilities were concerning, but were found on systems that did not have paper ballots, which is why they were required so it would be possible to prove vote switching did or did not occur. This circumstantial link between companies and the previous concerns raised about a system that lacked checks/balances (even though they now exist) are an attempt to assert that vote switching is possible so that the scenarios attested to by the witnesses can be viewed in a negative light that possibly might mean that someone exploited to previous possibly exploit that may or may not still be there.

2020-11-26 18:25:13 UTC  

Their last line will be β€œthere is no way you can certify this election (with all this made up smoke we created but have no proof for) β€œ @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

2020-11-26 18:25:52 UTC  

It will be the last plea to the court

2020-11-26 18:26:40 UTC  

Using Powell's logic, Justice Cavanaugh should be in prison as a serial rapist - not on SCOTUS.

the last plea is to how many members of their team were assaulted trying to substain some sort of valid court record. the stepping stone excuse

2020-11-26 18:27:49 UTC  

β€œAssaulted”

2020-11-26 18:27:54 UTC  

More claims

well they had to swap the lawyer because of their family being harassed ^^

2020-11-26 18:28:57 UTC  

Also what is this β€œwhy would they ruin their reputation” question keeps popping up. The only reputation that matters is with the trump base willing to bail out anyone with tons of money if they speak on their behalf.

2020-11-26 18:29:26 UTC  

That's not fair. One thing we know for sure is that there is no such thing as a Trump zealot who would sacrifice their reputation for this.

there are not that many donors and patsies than biden would have

2020-11-26 18:29:58 UTC  

Is there even any standing to Sidney Powell's lawsuits in GA and MI?

2020-11-26 18:30:54 UTC  

The people named in the top of the lawsuit are the ones who need standing, no?

2020-11-26 18:31:43 UTC  

No that is what people are asking. β€œ why would they ruin thier reputation” referring to the witnesses. There is ample evidence to show that these the trump base will support anyone who puts their β€œreputation on the line”. It’s a express ticket to book deals, interviews and attention from a very loyal and almost cult like group. Nothing is really sacrificed here. They will just be regulars on trump tv and continue to make money of the trump base @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

2020-11-26 18:32:03 UTC  

it's kinda reaching, she maybe made a point to their vulnerability, but hasn't asserted if they have been compromised.

the second half I'll ignore off topic. The first half is political rambling nonsense ^^

2020-11-26 18:32:39 UTC  

Oh yeah. Guess I didn't think that through. Maybe there are rabid fanatics who would do that.

2020-11-26 18:33:00 UTC  

Also I’d like to see evidence of any lawyer being harassed , there was a election worker that had to go into hiding because of death threats from trump supporters. However lawyers of high profile cases are more than used death threats. @π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š

2020-11-26 18:33:05 UTC  

Was there even any evidence submitted in her claims? Will an evidentiary hearing take place?

the left can't meme there would be more than death threats if it was a right wing setup

2020-11-26 18:34:06 UTC  

That's important.

it will be revealed to the public if trump has won through court the evidence comes later, public evidence ^^

2020-11-26 18:35:18 UTC  

I think it's telling that so many of the "witnesses" are lawyers and local politicians. A lot of them are people that want to be in the game and want to perform well for the coach. In this case, the coach is local party leadership which controls the purse strings. Having shown that you are a good team player by trying to "save the day" looks good to the coach and the fans (voters).

2020-11-26 18:35:28 UTC  

@π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š you would be very naive to think the trump base would not support anyone that even alludes to take their fraud theories in stride. Being a right wing personality is the easiest gig it world. It’s the same as any church you already have a captive loyal audience to market too. The only ceiling of procuring wealth from them is dependent on how you make them feel. You then have free reign to just say whatever you want

2020-11-26 18:36:56 UTC  

Sure seems like equal protection had a major influence in deciding Bush V. Gore

2020-11-26 18:37:00 UTC  

@π•΄π–“π–žπ–‡π–Žπ–˜π•΄π–“π–˜π–šπ–‘π–†π–™π–Š that’s called hope , I guarantee when nothing of value comes out people will still think there was fraud. Evidence and proof not part of the calculus that goes into determining fraud. It’s already a forgone conclusion on trump supports minds